Economic and Economic-Statistical Designs of the Side Sensitive Synthetic Coefficient of Variation Chart



   Volume 8
Wai Chung Yeong, Zhi Lin Chong, Khai Wah Khaw, Peh Sang Ng

Published online:  15 August 2022

Article Views: 25

Abstract

Control charts are useful tools to monitor signs of assignable cause(s) that results in poor quality products and services, especially in engineering applications. By convention, control charts detect shifts in the mean (µ) and standard deviation (σ). However, certain processes do not have a consistent µ and σ. For such processes, conventional charts will result in dubious conclusions. This motivated the development of charts monitoring the relationship between σ and µ instead, through the coefficient of variation (γ). The side sensitive synthetic chart was recently proposed to monitor γ. However, it is designed based on statistical considerations, i.e., by minimizing the expected number of samples required to detect a specific shift, while concurrently satisfying constraints in the false alarms. The weakness in this design is that it ignores the cost of the chart, which is important for most practical applications. Thus, we will propose economic and economic-statistical designs for the side sensitive synthetic γ chart, in which the former ignores statistical performance, while the latter incorporates statistical constraints. A Scicoslab program is developed to implement these two designs. The impact of various cost and process parameters are also studied.

Reference

  1. P. Castagliola, G. Celano, and S. Psarakis, “Monitoring the coefficient of variation using EWMA charts,” Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 249–265, 2011. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.2011.11917861
  2. C. W. Kang, M. S. Lee, Y. J. Seong, and D. M. Hawkins, “A control chart for the coefficient of variation,” Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 151–158, 2007. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.2007.11917682
  3. M. E. Calzada and S. M. Scariano, “A synthetic control chart for the coefficient of variation,” Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 853–867, 2013. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2011.639772
  4. P. Castagliola, A. Achouri, H. Taleb, G. Celano, and S. Psarakis, “Monitoring the coefficient of variation using a variable sampling interval control chart,” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1135–1149, 2013. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.1465
  5. H. W. You, M. B. Khoo, P. Castagliola, and A. Haq, “Monitoring the coefficient of variation using the side sensitive group runs chart,” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1913–1927, 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.1922
  6. A. N. B. Muhammad, W. C. Yeong, Z. L. Chong, S. L. Lim, and M. B. C. Khoo, “Monitoring the coefficient of variation using a variable sample
    size EWMA chart,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 126, pp. 378–398, 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.09.045
  7. A. Haq and M. B. Khoo, “New adaptive EWMA control charts for monitoring univariate and multivariate coefficient of variation,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 131, pp. 28–40, 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.03.027
  8. X. Chew and K. W. Khaw, “One-sided downward control chart for monitoring the multivariate coefficient of variation with VSSI strategy,” Journal of Mathematical and Fundamental Sciences, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 112–130, 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.5614/j.math.fund.sci.2020.52.1.8
  9. W. C. Yeong, P. Y. Lee, S. L. Lim, K. W. Khaw, and M. B. C. Khoo, “A side-sensitive synthetic co-efficient of variation chart,” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 2014–2033, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.2843
  10. A. J. Duncan, “The economic design of X charts used to maintain current control of a process,” Journal of the American statistical association, vol. 51, no. 274, pp. 228–242, 1956. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1956.10501322
  11. T. J. Lorenzen and L. C. Vance, “The economic design of control charts: A unified approach,” Technometrics, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 3–10, 1986.
  12. K.-J. Chung, “A simplified procedure for the economic design of control charts: A unified approach,” Engineering Optimization, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 313–320, 1991. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03052159108941078
  13. E. M. Saniga, “Economic statistical control-chart designs with an application to and R charts,” Technometrics, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 313–320, 1989. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1989.10488554
  14. W. C. Yeong, M. B. Khoo, Z. Wu, and P. Castagliola, “Economically optimum design of a synthetic chart,” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 725–741, 2012. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.1264
  15. W. C. Yeong, M. B. Khoo, M. H. Lee, and M. Rahim, “Economic and economic statistical designs of the synthetic X chart using loss functions,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 228, no. 3, pp. 571–581, 2013. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.02.021
  16. W. C. Yeong, M. B. Khoo, M. H. Lee, and M. Rahim, “Economically optimal design of a multivariate synthetic T 2 chart,” Communications in StatisticsSimulation and Computation, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1333–1361, 2014. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2012.731122
  17. W. Yeong, S. Lim, M. Khoo, M. Chuah, and A. Lim, “The economic and economic-statistical designs of the synthetic chart for the coefficient of variation,” Journal of Testing and Evaluation, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 1175–1195, 2017.
  18. M. Abouei Ardakan, A. Zeinal Hamadani, M. Sima, and M. Reihaneh, “A hybrid model for economic design of MEWMA control chart under maintenance policies,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 83, no. 9, pp. 2101–2110, 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7716-8
  19. A. Salmasnia, M. Kaveie, and M. Namdar, “An integrated production and maintenance planning model under VP-T2 hotelling chart,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 118, pp. 89–103, 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.02.021
  20. M. Tavana, Z. Li, M. Mobin, M. Komaki, and E. Teymourian, “Multi-objective control chart design optimization using NSGA-III and MOPSO enhanced with DEA and TOPSIS,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 50, pp. 17–39, 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.11.007
  21. Z. Wu and T. A. Spedding, “A synthetic control chart for detecting small shifts in the process mean,” Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 32–38, 2000. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.2000.11979969
  22. F. Y. Yen, K. M. B. Chong, and L. M. Ha, “Synthetictype control charts for time-between-events monitoring,” PloS One, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1 13, 2013. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065440
  23. P. Castagliola, S. Wu, M. B. Khoo, and S. Chakraborti, “Synthetic phase ii shewhart-type attributes control charts when process parameters
    are estimated,” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 315–335, 2014. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.1576
  24. A. F. B. Costa and M. A. G. Machado, “The steadystate behavior of the synthetic and side-sensitive synthetic double sampling charts,” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 297–303, 2015. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.1588
  25. A. Haq, J. Brown, and E. Moltchanova, “New synthetic control charts for monitoring process mean and process dispersion,” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1305–1325, 2015. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.1712
  26. A. Haq and M. B. Khoo, “A new synthetic control chart for monitoring process mean using auxiliary information,” Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, vol. 86, no. 15, pp. 3068–3092, 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2016.1150477
  27. E. Mamzeridou and A. C. Rakitzis, “Synthetic-type control charts for monitoring general inflated poisson processes (just accepted),” Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2022.2088791
  28. S. C. Shongwe and M. A. Graham, “On the performance of shewhart-type synthetic and runs-rules charts combined with an chart,” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 1357–1379, 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.1836
  29. S. C. Shongwe and M. A. Graham, “A modified side-sensitive synthetic chart to monitor the process mean,” Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 328–353, 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/16843703.2016.1208939
  30. F. D. Simões, R. C. Leoni, M. A. G. Machado, and A. F. B. Costa, “Synthetic charts to control bivariate processes with autocorrelated data,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 97, pp. 15–25, 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.04.005

To Cite this article

W. C. Yeong, Z. L. Chong, K. W. Khaw, and P. S. Ng, “Economic and economic-statistical designs of the side sensitive synthetic coefficient of variation chart,” International Journal of Applied and Physical Sciences, vol. 8, pp. 7-14, 2022. Doi:  https://dx.doi.org/10.20469/ijaps.8.50002