This research has two objectives, i.e. (i) to identify the advantages of implementing the Standard Method of Measurement (SMM) in Indonesia and (ii) to identify the challenges in implementing this Standard Method of Measurement (SMM) in the Indonesian construction industry. The research method used for this report was comprehensive literature from several countries that have already adopted this SMM and field observations. The results are presented in tables, and the benefits of adopting this measurement method i.e., SMM to advance the Indonesian construction industry are also highlighted. The findings show that there are at least 13 (thirteen) direct benefits and 3 (three) indirect benefits of implementing Standard Method of Measurement in Indonesia. The main benefit is to provide a foundation for measurement principles in the construction industry. The findings imply that with the government’s plan to increase construction projects for 2015 – 2019 development, this standard does not solely serve efficient construction measurement. However, it can also be used to control the project’s finance and prevent corruption.

1. V. R. Perumal and A. H. A. Bakar, “The needs for standardization of document towards an efficient communication in the construction industry,” Acta Technica Corviniensis-Bulletin of Engineering, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 23, 2011.
2. G. Nani, P. J. Edwards, T. Adjei-Kumi, E. Badu and P. Amoah, “Customisation and desirable characteristics of a standard method of measurement for building works in Ghanna,” The Australian Journal of Construction Economics and Building, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 30-40, 2008. https://dx.doi.org/10.5130/ajceb.v8i2.3004
3. G. Nani, A. Mills and T. Adjei-Kumi, “Misconception about the use of the standard method of measurement in developing countries: a Ghanaian perspective,” In Past, Present and Future: Inaugural Construction Management and Economics Conference, pp. 1175-1182, 2007. PMCid:PMC3478709
4. W. P. Utama, M. Peli and D. Y. Jumas, “Standardisasi Pengukuran Kuantitas Pekerjaan Konstruksi di Indonesia: Suatu Gagasan,” https://ftsp.bunghatta.ac.id/artikel-1-standardisasi_pengukuran_kuantitas_pekerjaan_konstruksi_di_indonesia__suatu_gagasan.html, 2008.
5. H. B. Goh and L. Chu, “Developing national standards for the classification of construction information in Singapore,” Presented in International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction CIB w78 Conference, 2002.
6. J. Molloy, “Civil engineering measurement claims in Hong Kong,” Strategic Integration of Surveying Services, FIG Working Week, pp. 13-17, 2007.
7. C. Jae-Ho, C. Woo-Chul, S. Hyung-Wook, T. Seung-Won, L. Jea-Sauk and C. Jae-Youl, “Practical standard methods of measurement cost estimating in the design stage,” Building Resilience, p. 95, 2008.
8. A. R. N. Akbar, M. F. Mohammad, M. Maisyam and E. W. W. Hong, “Desirable characteristics of malaysian standard method of measurements (mysmms) in meeting industry quality standards,” ASEAN-Turkey ASLI (Annual Serial Landmark International) Conference on Quality of Life 2014, ABRA International Conference on Quality of Life, AQoL2014, pp. 26-28, Istanbul, Turkey, 2014.
9. A. R. N. Akbar, M. F. Mohammad, N. Ahmad and M. Maisyam, “Adopting standardization in construction environment: standard method of measurement (SMMs),” Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 170, pp. 37-48, 2014. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.013
10. S. Hansen, Construction Contract Management: A Practical Guide to Managing Construction Projects. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2015.

S. Hansen, A. R. Salim, ―The importance of standard method of measurement in Indonesian construction industry,‖ International Journal ofTechnology and Engineering Studies, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 123-128, 2015.