This study aims to review wind morphing technology. Wing morphing is a newly emerging field of research in aeronautical engineering, which generally deals with supplanting the traditional wing flight dynamics and making it more efficient. This paper highlights the major advances in the field of research such that an overview of the methodology and findings of the researchers is provided. This is achieved by categorizing wing morphing and defining each of its types and then providing examples from past research. It is a qualitative study, and data were gathered from journal articles, conference papers, reports, and books. This study analyzed various types of wing morphing techniques prevalent now. Three major types of wing morphing technologies, including Planform, Out of-Plane, and Airfoil morphing, along with their subtypes, have been discussed. This study is relevant in current times as morphing has developed significantly in recent years. It is a concise and comprehensive overview of the types of structural wing morphing for fixed wings. It hence is useful as a beginner’s read into the vast world of futuristic-aerodynamic research.

1. R. M. Neilson, Aeroplane patents. London, England: Constable & Co, 1910.
2. D. L. Altshuler, J. W. Bahlman, R. Dakin, A. H. Gaede, B. Goller, D. Lentink, P. S. Segre, and D. A. Skandalis, “The biophysics of bird flight: functional relationships integrate aerodynamics, morphology, kinematics, muscles, and sensors,” Canadian Journal of Zoology, vol. 93, no. 12, pp. 961–975, 2015. doi: https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2015-0103
3. J. R. R. A. Martins, “Fuel burn reduction through wing morphing,” in Encyclopedia of Aerospace Engineering. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
4. S. L. Chernyshev, S. V. Lyapunov, and A. V. Wolkov, “Modern problems of aircraft aerodynamics,” Advances in Aerodynamics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42774-019-0007-6
5. C. Beaverstock, A. Coles, L. L. Parsons, and M. Friswell, “Aerodynamic forces on morphing wings during span extension,” in Advanced Aero Concepts, Design and Operations, Bristol, England, 2014.
6. K. Xiao, Y. Chen, W. Jiang, C. Wang, and L. Zhao, “Modeling, simulation and implementation of a bird- inspired morphing wing aircraf,” in 3rd International Conference on Robotics and Automation Sciences (ICRAS), Wuhan, China, 2019.
7. Z. Lyu and J. R. Martins, “Aerodynamic shape optimization of an adaptive morphing trailing-edge wing,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 1951–1970, 2015. doi: https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C033116
8. Y. Tani, K. Miyazaki, S. Aso, H. Ura, and T. Ito, “Aerodynamic noise reduction for high lift devices using morphing flap concept,” in 29th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, ICAS, St. Petersburg, Russia. International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, 2014.
9. L. Matloff, E. Chang, T. Feo, L. Jeffries, A. Stowers, C. Thomson, and D. Lentink, “How flight feathers stick together to form a continuous morphing wing,” Science, vol. 367, no. 6475, pp. 293–297, 2020.
10. T. Yue, X. Zhang, L. Wang, and J. Ai, “Flight dynamic modeling and control for a telescopic wing morphing aircraft via asymmetric wing morphing,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 70, pp. 328–338, 2017.
11. S. Barbino, O. Bilgen, R. Ajaj, M. Friswell, and D. Inman, “A review of aircraft,” Journal of Intelligent Maerial Systems and Structures, vol. 22, pp. 823–877, 2011.
12. Q. Chanzy and A. Keane, “Analysis and experimental validation of morphing UAV wings,” The Aeronautical Journal, vol. 122, no. 1249, pp. 390–408, 2018.
13. P. Santos, J. Sousa, and P. Gamboa, “Variable-span wing development for improved flight performance,” Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 961–978, 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X15595719
14. A. Sofla, S. Meguid, K. Tan, and W. Yeo, “Shape morphing of aircraft wing: Status and challenges,” Materials & Design, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 1284 1292, 2010. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.09.011
15. A. Jameson, J. C. Vassberg, and S. Shankaran, “Aerodynamic-structural design studies of low-sweep transonic wings,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 505–514, 2010. doi: https://doi.org/10.2514/1.42775
16. V. P. Galantai, Design and analysis of morphing wing for unmanned aerial vehicles. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto, 2010.
17. N. R. Kluga, “A study of flap management, an analysis of the consequences of flap management, and a search for possible causes,” Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 1–10, 1991.
18. K. R. Olympio and F. Gandhi, “Flexible skins for morphing aircraft using cellular honeycomb cores,” Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, vol. 21, no. 17, pp. 1719–1735, 2010. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X09350331
19. C. K, S. R. P, V. A, A. Tanzeel, and H. N. G, “Dihedral and anhedral convertible wing mechanismfor UAV,” International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 87–92, 2020.
20. M. Abdulrahim and R. Lind, “Flight testing and response characteristics of a variable gull-wing morphing aircraft,” in AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, Rhode Island, RI, 2004, p. 5113.
21. J. Manzo, E. Garcia, A. Wickenheiser, and G. C.Horner, “Design of a shape-memory alloy actuated macro-scale morphing aircraft mechanism,” in Smart Structures and Materials 2005: Smart Structures and Integrated Systems, San Diego, CA, vol. 5764, 2005.
22. M. Secanell, A. Suleman, and P. Gamboa, “Design of a morphing airfoil using aerodynamic shape optimization,” AIAA Journal, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 1550–1562, 2006. doi: https://doi.org/10.2514/1.18109
23. M. Detrick and G. Washington, “Modeling anddesign of a morphing wing for micro unmanned aerial vehicles via active twist,” in 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, 2007.
24. T. Martin. (2010) The aerosente glider worksho. [Online]. Available: https://bit.ly/2VE5aZi
25. C. H. Gibbs-Smith, Sir George Cayley’s Aeronautics, 1796-1855. London, UK: HM Stationery Office, 1962.
26. O. Bilgen, M. Friswell, K. Kochersberger, and D. Inman, “Surface actuated variable-camber and variable-twist morphing wings using piezocomposites,” in 52nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Denver, CO, 2011.
27. J. Sun, F. Scarpa, Y. Liu, and J. Leng, “Morphing thickness in airfoils using pneumatic flexible tubes and Kirigami honeycomb,” Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 755–763, 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X15580656
28. M. V. Donadon and L. Iannucci, “A numerical study on smart material selection for flapped and twisted morphing wing configurations,” Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management, vol. 6, pp. 281–290, 2014. doi: https://doi.org/10.5028/jatm.v6i3.341
29. S. Ameduri and A. Concilio, “Morphing wings review: Aims, challenges, and current open issues of a technology,” Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, vol. 1, pp. 54–62, 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406220944423
30. Alamy. (2005) An S-3B viking, assigned to the “scouts” of sea control squadron two four (VS-24), folds its wings after recovering aboard the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71). [Online]. Available: https://bit.ly/3s6afW9
31. T. Yue, L. Wang, and J. Ai, “Gain self-scheduled H control for morphing aircraft in the wing transition process based on an LPV model,” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 909–917, 2013. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2013.06.004
32. X.-w. XU, W. ZHANG, and Z. Hao, “Analysis of asymmetric control efficiency for folding wing morphing aircraft,” in International Conference on Mathematics, Modelling and Simulation Technologies and Applications (MMSTA 2017), Xiamen, China, no. mmsta, 2017.
33. P. Oettershagen, A. Melzer, T. Mantel, K. Rudin, T. Stastny, B. Wawrzacz, T. Hinzmann, S. Leutenegger, K. Alexis, and R. Siegwart, “Design of small hand-launched solar-powered UAVs: From concept study to a multi-day world endurance record flight,” Journal of Field Robotics, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 1352–1377, 2017.