A Study on the Establishing Alternative Security System in Transition Order
Volume 5, Issue 5 Moon Ye Chan
Published online:26 October 2019
Article Views: 37
Abstract
This paper proposes an alternative security system in the international community. The U.S.-China trade war and the scrapping of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty have intensified the global hegemonic war. The international community faced a transition order, promoting the emergence of a new multi-polar system. As a result, security concerns in each country were increased, especially a new arms race for nuclear power began, and the nuclear deterrence regime is collapsing. A new security dilemma is about to emerge. Since the treaty on nuclear weapons has been scrapped, armed war is worth considering. In the transition period, a new order should be prepared to replace the INF treaty and realigning a perspective of international politics. The research adopted a qualitative approach
such that the data is retrieved through journal articles, monographs, and reports. This research analyzed the limitation of the existing security system through papers and empirical evidence. This paper suggests the peace building process through the ASEAN Regional Security Forum (ARF). The forum covers Asia, Europe, and America, and it is the only multilateral security consultative group in which North Korea participates. By expanding ARF, unilateral diplomacy based on each countrys interests can be prevented; moreover, ARF can establish an alternative security system that neutralizing hegemonic war. Ultimately, ARF should connect the Nuclear Weapon Free Zone on each continent by establishing Free Zone in Northeast Asia. Focusing on the value and role of ARF, the current study provided a new aspect of accessing international peace security and rendered valuable suggestions for policy-makers.
Reference
A. Lanoszka, “The inf treaty,” Strategic Studies Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 48–67, 2019.
S. H. Lee, “A new security threats and transformation of NATO in the 21st century: The analysis of 2010 NATO strategic concept,” Journal of National Defence Studies, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 91–116, 2019.
C. K. Byun, “ASEAN way and the regional security in Southeast Asia: Accomplishment and problems,” Korean Journal of Political Science, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 165–187, 2009.
D. W. Ohn, “ASEAN and the security and cooperation in East Asia,” Southeast Asia Journal, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 253–281, 2012.
S.-H. Kim, The Success or the Failure of North Korean Denuclearization and Its Impact on Northeast Asian International Relations. Seoul, South Korea: Korea Research Institute For Strategy, 2019.
J. Duffield, “The north atlantic treaty organization: Alliance theory,” in Explaining International Relations Since 1945, N. Woods, Ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1996.
J. J. Mearsheimer, “Back to the future: Instability in europe after the cold war,” International security, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 5–56, 1990. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2538981
S.-H. Lee, “Recomposition of UN security council and qualifications of its permanent member,” The Journal of Political Science & Communication, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 113–130, 2014.
G. C. Gwon, “Overcoming of the cold war system and the lost decade of the collective security: A critical reconstruction from the perspective of peace research,” The Korean Journal of International Relationship, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 29–51, 2003.
K. O-Yoon and S. Ding-Chang, “Preconditions for a cooperative security regime in Northeast Asia,” Peace Studies, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 59–95, 2007.
A. J. Bailes, P. Dunay, P. Guang, and M. Troitskiy, The Shanghai cooperation organization. Solna, Sweden: SIPRI, 2007.
M. d. Haas, “The peace mission 2007 exercises: The Shanghai Cooperation Organization advances,” Defence Academy of the United Kingdom, Tech. Rep., 2007.
B. Lo, Axis of Convenience: Moscow, Beijing, and the New Geopolitics. Washington, DC, WA: Brookings Institute Press, 2008.
J. V. Anderson and A. J. Nelson, “The inf treaty,” Strategic Studies Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 90–122, 2019.
U. Kühn and A. Péczeli, “Russia, NATO, and the INF treaty,” Strategic Studies Quarterly, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 66–99, 2017.
To Cite this article
M. Y. Chan, “A Study on the establishing alternative security system in transition order”, International Journal of Technology and Engineering Studies, vol. 5, no. 5, pp.157–162, 2019
