Innovation and entrepreneurship are essential for promoting sustainable development and filling a large research vacuum. With the goal of creating a comprehensive understanding based on the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) hypothesis, this study provides a thorough analysis of how they interact. By utilizing qualitative techniques, we examine previous research and relevant studies to develop a solid conceptual framework. It reveals a significant void in our knowledge of the ways that innovations in entrepreneurship support sustainable development. A comprehensive framework that incorporates economic, social, and environmental components is noticeably lacking, despite the fact that practical aspects have been investigated. According to our research, entrepreneurial innovations can promote sustainable development within the TBL framework by bringing about favourable social and environmental consequences in addition to economic growth. We do, however, recognize the difficulties in striking this balance, stressing the necessity for entrepreneurs to adopt the TBL strategy, promote innovation with a sustainability focus, and encourage teamwork. It is recommended that policymakers provide incentives for sustainable innovation, provide explicit guidelines, and foster ecosystems of entrepreneurship. To further our knowledge of this link, future research should do quantitative investigations, examine examples relevant to context, and use longitudinal techniques.

1. Alshebami, A. S. (2023). Green innovation, self-efficacy, entrepreneurial orientation and economic performance: Interactions among saudi small enterprises. Sustainability, 15(3), 1961.
2. Aparicio, S., Hughes, M., Audretsch, D., & Urbano, D. (2023). Incentivizing knowledge institutions for entrepreneurship and society. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research.
3. Arcega, I. B. (2023). Investigating indigenous people perspectives on entrepreneurial leadership and practices in the promotion of sustainable economic development. International Journal of Professional Business Review: Int. J. Prof. Bus. Rev., 8(8), 58.
4. Bei, J. (2023). Social enterprises’ institutional rationale and its inspirations for the modern market economy. Scholarly Journal, 18(1), 2-15.
5. Bharadiya, J. P. (2023). A comparative study of business intelligence and artificial intelligence with big data analytics. American Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 7(1), 24.
6. Bjørk, A., & Hestetun, H. (2023). Sustainable innovation: an approach to the external-relation perspective and the triple bottom line. Unpublished master’s thesis, Høgskulen på Vestlandet.
7. Butt, A. (2023). Promoting sustainable development: The role of environmental law and international cooperation.
8. Cardone, C., & Zavjalova, A. (2023). Examining the adoption of blockchain technology in the diamond industry: Benefits and challenges of embracing disruptive innovation in conservative sectors.
9. Chaudry, K. (2023). The role of social entrepreneurship in promoting sustainable development and addressing environmental challenges.
10. Daradkeh, M. (2023). Navigating the complexity of entrepreneurial ethics: a systematic review and future research agenda. Sustainability, 15(14), 11099.
11. Davidsson, P. (2003). The domain of entrepreneurship research: Some suggestions. In Cognitive approaches to entrepreneurship research (Vol. 6, p. 315-372). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
12. Dedi, D. (2023). E-commerce online buying and selling transactions in the perspective of islamic law. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 6(1.2).
13. Delgado-Ceballos, J., Ortiz-De-Mandojana, N., Antolín-López, R., & Montiel, I. (2023). Connecting the sustainable development goals to firm-level sustainability and esg factors: The need for double materiality (Vol. 26) (No. 1). SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England.
14. Fischer, E., & Guzel, G. T. (2023). The case for qualitative research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 33(1), 259-272.
15. Fischer, M. M., & Nijkamp, P. (2018). The nexus of entrepreneurship and regional development.
16. García-González, A., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2023). Social entrepreneurship competency in higher education: an analysis using mixed methods. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 14(1), 91-109.
17. Gliga, G., & Evers, N. (2023). Marketing capability development through networking–an entrepreneurial marketing perspective. Journal of Business Research, 156, 113472.
18. Gupta, B. B., Gaurav, A., Panigrahi, P. K., & Arya, V. (2023). Analysis of artificial intelligence-based technologies and approaches on sustainable entrepreneurship. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 186, 122152.
19. Hota, P. K. (2023). Tracing the intellectual evolution of social entrepreneurship research: Past advances, current trends, and future directions. Journal of Business Ethics, 182(3), 637-659.
20. Jain, R., & Ali, S. W. (2013). A review of facilitators, barriers and gateways to entrepreneurship: directions for future research. South Asian Journal of Management, 20(3), 122.
21. Khan, S. A. R., Yu, Z., & Farooq, K. (2023). Green capabilities, green purchasing, and triple bottom line performance: Leading toward environmental sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 2022-2034.
22. Kruesi, M. A., & Bazelmans, L. (2023). Resources, capabilities and competencies: a review of empirical hospitality and tourism research founded on the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 6(2), 549-574.
23. Kulkarni, M. M., & Khan, M. Z. (2023). The evolution and impact of e-commerce on malls in india: A comparative analysis. EPRA International Journal of Economic and Business Review (JEBR), 11(5), 24-29.
24. Mathew, V. S. (2023). Happiness a driver for innovation at the workplace. In Understanding happiness: An explorative view (p. 335-344). Springer.
25. Mendes, T., Braga, V., Correia, A., & Silva, C. (2023). Linking corporate social responsibility, cooperation and innovation: the triple bottom line perspective. Innovation & Management Review, 20(3), 244-280.
26. Mondal, S., Singh, S., & Gupta, H. (2023). Assessing enablers of green entrepreneurship in circular economy: An integrated approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135999.
27. Moon, C. J. (2018). Contributions to the sdgs through social and eco entrepreneurship: New mindsets for sustainable solutions. Entrepreneurship and the sustainable development goals, 47-68.
28. Moshier, J. H. (2023). The sharing economy: A disruptive innovator for city government. Local Government Management.
29. Parmaxi, A. (2023). Virtual reality in language learning: A systematic review and implications for research and practice. Interactive learning environments, 31(1), 172-184.
30. Pav˘ aloaia, V.-D., & Necula, S.-C. (2023). Artificial intelligence as a disruptive technologya systematic literature review. ˘Electronics, 12(5), 1102.
31. Pelly, R. D. M., & Kulik, S. (2024). A triography on the sharing economy. In A world scientific encyclopedia of business storytelling set 1: Corporate and business strategies of business storytelling volume 1: Business storytelling in entrepreneurship (p. 107-131). World Scientific.
32. Ruggerio, C. A. (2021). Sustainability and sustainable development: A review of principles and definitions. Science of the Total Environment, 786, 147481.
33. Runhardt, R. W. (2023). Mixed methods research and critical realism reconsidered. In Philosophical foundations of mixed methods research (p. 194-209). Routledge.
34. Sahoo, S., & Goswami, S. (2024). Theoretical framework for assessing the economic and environmental impact of water pollution: A detailed study on sustainable development of india. Journal of Future Sustainability, 4(1), 23-34.
35. Samaneh Norouzi, R. C. . H. M., Sedigheh Sadat Tavafian. (2023). Understanding risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders in iranian housewives: Development of a comprehensive health promotion behavior model. BMC Public Health,, 23(1), 617.
36. Sarvari, R., Jabarzadeh, Y., Karami, A., & Jabarnejad, M. (2023). An interpretive structural modelinganalytic network process approach for analysing green entrepreneurship barriers. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1-25.
37. Singh, D., & Awasthy, R. (2023). Lokasamgraha: An indigenous construct for social entrepreneurship. IIMB Management Review.
38. Solaimani, S., van Eck, T., Kievit, H., & Koelemeijer, K. (2022). An exploration of the applicability of lean startup in small non-digital firms: an effectuation perspective. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 28(9), 198-218.
39. Tate, W. L., & Bals, L. (2018). Achieving shared triple bottom line (tbl) value creation: toward a social resource-based view (srbv) of the firm. Journal of Business Ethics, 152, 803-826.
40. Tülüce, N. S., & Yurtkur, A. K. (2015). Term of strategic entrepreneurship and schumpeter’s creative destruction theory. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207, 720-728.
41. Vasist, P. N., & Krishnan, S. (2023). Fake news and sustainability-focused innovations: A review of the literature and an agenda for future research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135933.
42. Vig, S. (2023). Sustainable development through sustainable entrepreneurship and innovation: a single-case approach. Social Responsibility Journal, 19(7), 1196-1217.
43. Yáñez-Valdés, C., & Guerrero, M. (2023). Equity crowdfunding platforms and sustainable impacts: encountering investors and technological initiatives for tackling social and environmental challenges. European Journal of Innovation Management.
44. Zahra, S. A., & Wright, M. (2016). Understanding the social role of entrepreneurship. Journal of management studies, 53(4), 610-629.

Mohammed, A. & Kumar, S. (2022). Empowering Sustainable Development Through Entrepreneurship Innovations. International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 8(1), 10-20. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.20469/ijhss.8.20002-1