KKG PUBLICATIONS
  • Home
  • Journals
    • BUSINESS & ADMINISTRATIVE STUDIES
    • HUMANITIES, ARTS & SOCIAL SCIENCES
    • TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING STUDIES
    • APPLIED SCIENCES
    • MEDICAL SCIENCES
  • Publishing Ethics
  • Privacy Policy
  • Crossmark Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Journals
    • BUSINESS & ADMINISTRATIVE STUDIES
    • HUMANITIES, ARTS & SOCIAL SCIENCES
    • TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING STUDIES
    • APPLIED SCIENCES
    • MEDICAL SCIENCES
  • Publishing Ethics
  • Privacy Policy
  • Crossmark Policy
  • Contact Us
  • https://evolua.ispcaala.com/
  • http://pewarta.org/styles/
  • https://perhepi.org/
  • https://portal-indonesia.id/
  • https://nursahid.com/
  • https://singmanfaat.jabarprov.go.id/
  • https://sindika.co.id/
  • https://cirebonkerja.id/
  • https://klikoku.id/
  • https://iii.cemacyc.org/minicursos/
  • https://iv.cemacyc.org/creditos/
  • https://iv.cemacyc.org/
  • https://www.winteriorsdecor.com/
  • https://e-journal.polnes.ac.id/
  • https://dap.sumbarprov.go.id/
  • https://dinkes.sarolangunkab.go.id/
  • https://bappeda.sarolangunkab.go.id/
  • https://sipena.rsjrw.id/
  • https://slims.assunnah.ac.id/
  • https://ojs.as-pub.com/
  • https://techniumscience.com/


Constructing a Scale of Students’ Attitudes Towards Distance Learning at Jordanian Private Universities



   Volume 7, Issue 1
Mo’en Salman Saleem Alnasraween, Raeda Mofid George Ammari, Sharif Abdelrhman Alsoudi, Taha Oklah Alkursheh, Yazan Shaker
Almahameed

Published online: 29 March 2021

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to construct and apply a measuring scale to investigate students’ attitudes towards distance learning at Amman Arab University, a private university in Jordan, through the evaluation of students attitudes, opinions, and perceptions of distance learning. The study sample consisted of 731 students. A scale was developed, consisting of 45 items. The validity and reliability of the scale were assured; using the Factor Analysis procedure, the results showed a one-factor present in the performance on this scale. Also, the scree plot assured this result. In addition, the result showed a moderately positive attitude towards distance learning; teacher and student interaction was encouraging. Also, the results showed no statistically significant difference between the arithmetic means attributed to student gender. Thus, students’ attitudes and opinions favored distance learning. This study may provide feedback to decision-makers at the university to reveal the distance learning challenges facing them. The outcomes will help students and administrators make decisions concerning these challenges and how to overcome them to implement a successful e-learning system at the university.

Reference

  1. Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2020). Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: The challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180
  2. M. S. (2019). A shift from classroom to distance learning: Advantages and limitations. International Journal of Research in English Education, 4(1), 80–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.29252/ijree.4.1.80
  3. Basak, S. K., Wotto, M., & Bélanger, P. (2018). E-learning, m-learning and d-learning: Conceptual definition and comparative analysis. E-Learning and Digital Media, 15(4), 191–216. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753018785180
  4. Bray, E., Aoki, K., & Dlugosh, L. (2008). Predictors of learning satisfaction in japanese online distance learners. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(3), 65-72. doi:https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v9i3.525
  5. Chen, C. (2010). Brief introduction of new instruction network learning. Living Technology Education Journal, 34(4), 10-16.
  6. Crano, W. D., & Prislin, R. (2006). Attitudes and persuasion. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 345-374.
  7. Daniel, S. J. (2020). Education and the COVID-19 pandemic. Prospects, 49, 91-96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09464-3
  8. Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5-22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
  9. Enkin, E., & Mejías-Bikandi, E. (2017). The effectiveness of online teaching in an advanced Spanish language course. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 176–197. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12112
  10. Firat, M. (2016). Measuring the e-learning autonomy of distance education students. Open Praxis, 8(3), 93-101. doi:http://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.310
  11. Gamage, K., Sliva, E., & Gunawardhana, N. (2020). Online delivery and assessment during COVID-19: Safeguarding academic integrity. Education Sciences, 10(4), 301-315. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110301
  12. Gonzalez, D., & Louis, R. (2018). Online learning. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 3(2), 33-40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0423
  13. Hanson, D., & Maushak, N. (1996). Distance education: Review of the literature. Ames, IA: Research Institute for Studies in Education.
  14. Isik, A. H., Karakis, R., & Güler, G. (2010). Postgraduate students’ attitudes towards distance learning (the case study of Gazi university). Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 218–222. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.139
  15. Jacobs, G., Renandya, A., & Power, M. (2016). Learner autonomy: Simple, powerful strategies for student centered learning. Berlin, Germany: Springer International Publishing.
  16. Kuo, Y.-C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. E. (2013). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(1), 16-22. doi:https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1338
  17. Lewis, J. (2000). Distance education foundation: Distance education in nursing. Berlin, Germany: Springer Publications.
  18. Liguori, E., & Winkler, C. (2020). From offline to online: Challenges and opportunities for entrepreneurship education following the COVID-19 pandemic. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 3(4), 346-351. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127420916738
  19. Liu, H.-C., & Yen, J.-R. (2014). Effects of distance learning on learning effectiveness. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(6). doi:https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1218a
  20. Lynch, R., & Dembo, M. (2004). The relationship between self-regulation and online learning in a blended learning context. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 5(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v5i2.189
  21. Mahruf, M., & Shohel, C. (2012). Open and distance learning for teachers’ professional development: The English in Action (EIA) model for the global south. International Perspectives of Distance Learning in Higher Education, 9(3), 98-108. doi:https://doi.org/10.5772/33117
  22. Mirahmadizadeh, A., Ranjbar, K., Shahriarirad, R., Erfani, E., Ghaem, H., Jafari, K., & Rahimi, T. (2020). Evaluation of students attitude and emotions towards the sudden closure of schools. BMC Psychology, 8(134), 1-7.
  23. Ngussa, B. M., & Mbuti, E. E. (2017). The influence of humour on learners attitude and mathematics achievement: A case of secondary schools in Arusha city, Tanzania. Journal of Educational Research, 2(3), 170-181.
  24. Pace, D. (2020). The use of Formative Assessment (FA) in online teaching and learning during the COVID-19 compulsory education school closure: The Maltese experience. Malta Review of Education Research, 14(2), 243-271.
  25. Shrigley, R. (1983). The attitude concept and science teaching. Science Education, 67, 425-442.
  26. Simonson, M. (2002). In case you are asked: The effectiveness of distance education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(4), 8-12.
  27. Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (1999). Teaching and learning at a distance-foundations of distance education. New Jersey, NJ: Wiley.
  28. Traxler, J. (2018). Distance learning—predictions and possibilities. Education Sciences, 8(1), 35-40.doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8010035
  29. UNESCO. (2002). Open and distance learning – trends, policy and strategy considerations. Paris, France: Author.
  30. Unger, S., & Meiran, W. (2020). Student attitudes towards online education during the COVID-19 viral outbreak of 2020: Distance learning in a time of social distance. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(4), 257-266.
  31. Valantinaite, I., & Paciauskien, Z. (2020). The change in students attitude towards favourable and unfavourable factors of online learning environments. Sustainability, 12, 79-86. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197960
  32. Williams, M., Paprock, K., & Covington, B. (1998). Distance learning: The essential guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  33. Yuzer, T. V., & Kurubacak, G. (2015). education handbook of research on emerging priorities and trends in distance education: Communication, pedagogy, and technology. Pennsylvania, PA: IGI Global.
  34. Zigerell, J. (1984). Distance education: An information age approach to adult education. Ohio, OH: National Center for Research in Vocational Education.
  35. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

To Cite this article

Alnasraween, M. S. S., Ammari, R. M. G., Alsoudi, S. A., Alkursheh, T. O., & Almahameed, Y. Z. (2021). Constructing a scale of students’ attitudes towards distance learning at Jordanian private universities. International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 7(1), 1-13. https://dx.doi.org/10.20469/ijhss.7.20001-1



© 2020. KKG Publications
Calle Alarcon 66, Sant Adrian De Besos 08930, Barcelona Spain | 00 34 610 911 348
About Us | Contact Us | Feedback

Search