Social innovation is a driver for change and a solution for social challenges. Literature review shows the difficulties in defining, identifying, and measuring social innovation, especially in rural community development. However, given the emerging social innovation in rural communities, this article aims to measure social innovation based on the University Ambassador Program (UAP). This program is one of the successful programs under the National Transformation and Blue Ocean Strategy. The program aims to improve people’s living standards through several useful programs. Qualitative methods are used in this study, i.e., in-depth interviews, whether face-to-face or over the phone. 20 respondents had been interviewed. The study of self-impact and university ambassadors’ contribution to village transformation was analyzed using SWOT. It involves youths elected from among rural university students with the characteristics of student leaders who are concerned with the local community. The findings are obtained by interviewing 20 respondents involved with UAP in depth. SWOT analysis is used to identify the impact of university ambassadors in social innovation on the development of rural communities in Malaysia. Social innovation is an approach to meet the community’s needs by creating new methods, products, services, and means. The context of social innovation assessment is through the three main education, economy, and social elements. The findings show that UAP needs to be strengthened in the context of the skills and knowledge of ambassadors or students in delivering information to rural communities to benefit effectively.

1. Ahmad, M. F., Ali, M. H. M., & Sulaiman, Z. (2018). Employability skills through industrial training: Employers perspective. Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 1(5), 01-05.
2. Gartland, C. (2015). Student ambassadors: Role-models, learning practices and identities. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 36(8), 1192-1211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2014.886940
3. Gibson, K., Graham, J., & Roelvink, G. (2013). Social innovation for community economies: How action research creates ’other worlds. In D. MacCallum & F. Moulaert (Eds.), The international handbook on social innovation: Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
4. Jali, M. N., Abas, Z., & Ariffin, A. S. (2017). Social innovation in the context of strategic knowledge management processes for supply chain performance enhancement. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 6(1), 233–237.
5. Jennings Mel. (2003). Practical guide to working with arts ambassadors. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/36X75vm
6. Kanduri, S., & Suripeddi, R. K. (2018). A study of research in higher educational institutions: Challenges and implications. International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 4(5), 203-212. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.20469/ijhss.4.10002-5
7. Keong, C. S., Yip, M. W., Swee, N. S. L., Toh, G. G., & Tai, S. C. (2017). A review of TRIZ and its benefits & challenges in stimulating creativity in problem solving of pre-university students: A TARUC case study. Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(5), 247-263. doi:https://doi.org/10.20474/jahss-3.5.2
8. Klein, J.-L., Fontan, J.-M., Harrisson, D., & Levesque, B. (2013). The Quebec model: A social innovation system founded on cooperation and consensus building. In Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
9. Klein, J.-L., Tremblay, D.-G., & Bussières, D. R. (2010). Social economy-based local initiatives and social innovation: A montreal case study. International Journal of Technology Management, 51(1), 121–138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2010.033132
10. Leiber, T., Stensaker, B., & Harvey, L. C. (2018). Bridging theory and practice of impact evaluation of quality management in higher education institutions: A SWOT analysis. European Journal of Higher Education, 8(3), 351–365. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2018.1474782
11. Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Swyngedouw, E., & Gonzalez, S. (2005). Towards alternative model(s) of local innovation. Urban studies, 42(11), 1969–1990. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500279893
12. Mulgan, G. (2006). The process of social innovation. Innovations: Technology, governance, globalization, 1(2), 145-162.
13. Nickson, L. M., & Henriksen, R. C. (2013). Leaders and recruiters from the next generation: A phenomenological study. The Qualitative Report, 19(35), 1-13.
14. Paul, B., & Jorge, C. (2015). Universities contributions to social innovation: Reflections in theory & practice null. European Journal of Innovation Management, 18(4), 508–527.
15. Phills, J. A., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(4), 34-43.
16. Pol, E., & Ville, S. (2009). Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(6), 878-885. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2009.02.011
17. Unceta, A., Castro-Spila, J., & Garcia Fronti, J. (2016). Social innovation indicators. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 29(2), 192–204. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2015.1127137
18. Ylonen, A. (2012). Student ambassador experience in higher education: Skills and competencies for the future? British Educational Research Journal, 38(5), 801–811. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2011.583636

Malek, J. A., Tahir, N. H. Z., & Baharudin, R. A. (2020). Assessing the impact of university ambassador program through social innovation for rural community development in Malaysia. International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 6(5), 186-194. doi: 10.20469/ijhss.6.20002-5