This study has been undertaken to investigate the memory strategies used by the students. Moreover, this study aims to analyze the relationship between memory strategies used by the students and their grades. Primary data is undertaken in this research that is gathered with the help of a survey questionnaire. The survey questionnaire is filled with a total of 175 adolescent students. The data collected through the survey questionnaire is analyzed with the help of the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Regression analysis is used to analyze the impact of memory strategies on the student’s feeling of success. It is analyzed from the results of regression analysis that F (1.173) = 12.779, p = .001, R2= .069. The value of R2= .069, which means that memory strategies explain 6% variation in the English score of the students. It is identified about the research aim that the use of memory strategy and students grades are significantly correlated with each other. Further, it is also examined that the majority of the students use memory strategies in the form of narratives, self-test, rehearsals, rhymes, and mental practice. The study findings would help the students to analyze the significance of memory strategy for increasing their scores. Future research should be focused on conducting their study at a wider level to analyze the impact of memory strategies for the student’s primary schools and high schools.

1. Abdel-Khalek, A. (1989). Fundamentals of psychology (3rd ed.). Alexandria, Egypt: Dar Al-Maarifa Al-Jamiiyah.
2. Abhakorn, J. (2008). The implications of learner strategies for second or foreign language teaching. Annual Review of Education, Communication & Language Sciences, 5, 186-204.
3. Alghamdi, M. (2008). Education in Saudi Arabia. Riyadh, KSA: Alroshed.
4. Alghamdi, M. (2011). Development of the Saudi Arabia education system. Riyadh, KSA: Al Rashed.
5. Al Kholi, A. (2004). The impact of the interaction between some memory aids and cognitive settlement method/pro-truding retention among a sample of students from the end of the stage of basic education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Al-Azhar, Cairo, Egypt.
6. Baddeley, A. D., Eysenck, M. W., & Anderson, M. (2009). Memory. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
7. Bergin, C. C., & Bergin, D. A. (2014). Child and adolescent development in your classroom. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
8. Chang, S. H. (2015). Memory strategies used by teachers. Ohio Journal of Teacher Education, 29(1), 5-19.
9. Dehn, M. J. (2010). Long-term memory problems in children and adolescents. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
10. Frank, C., Land, W. M., Popp, C., & Schack, T. (2014). Mental representation and mental practice: Experimental investigation on the functional links between motor memory and motor imagery. PLoS ONE, 9(4), 51–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095175
11. Genuba, R. L., & Abellanosa, G. G. (2018). Identity orientations, 21st century skills and classroom management strategies of teachers: A structural equation model on the student engagement. Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(3), 127-136. doi:https://doi.org/10.20474/jahss-4.3.2
12. Goldmeier, E. (2014). The memory trace (PLE: Memory). London: Psychology Press.
13. Gutchess, A. H., & Indeck, A. (2009). Cultural influences on memory. In Progress in brain research (pp. 137–150). Elsevier.
14. Hamlyn, D. W. (2017). The psychology of perception. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
15. Hendelman, W. J., Humphreys, P., & Skinner, C. R. (2017). The integrated nervous system. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
16. Irwin, J. (2019). Student critical thinking objectivism. Journal Of Advanced Research In Social Sciences And Humanities, 4(3), 80-89. doi:https://doi.org/10.26500/jarssh-04-2019-0301
17. Karpicke, J. D., Butler, A. C., & Roediger III, H. L. (2009). Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practice retrieval when they study on their own? Memory, 17(4), 471 479. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210802647009
18. Keong, C. S., Yip, M. W., Swee, N. S. L., Toh, G. G., & Tai, S. C. (2017). A review of TRIZ and its benefits & challenges in stimulating creativity in problem solving of pre-university students: A TARUC case study. Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(5), 247-263. doi:https://doi.org/10.20474/jahss-3.5.2
19. Kihlstrom, J. F. (2013). Memory research: The convergence of theory and practice. In D. J. Herrmann, C. Hertzog, C. McEvoy, P. Hertel, & M. K. Johnson (Eds.), Basic and applied memory research: Practical applications (Vol. 2, pp. 5–26). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
20. Malroutu, Y. L. (2017). Enhancing student learning experience in blended classroom teaching. Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(6). doi:https://doi.org/10.20474/jahss-3.6.4
21. McPherson, M. S., & Schapiro, M. O. (2010). Keeping college affordable: Government and educational opportunity. Washington, DC, WA: Brookings Institution Press.
22. Muller, J. R. (2017). Capturing student learning with thematic analysis. Journal of Advanced Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(6), 342–347. doi:https://doi.org/10.26500/jarssh-02-2017-0601
23. Saudi, M. M. (1993). The impact of the interaction between some mental visualization and material properties educated strategies to remember (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). King Saud University, Riyadh, KSA.
24. Schneider, V. I., Healy, A. F., & Bourne, L. E. (2002). What is learned under difficult conditions is hard to forget: Contextual interference effects in foreign vocabulary acquisition, retention, and transfer. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(2), 419–440. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2813