The rise of learning innovation suggested that distance learning includes the use of technologies such as video, audio, computer, and multimedia communications to support extended teaching and learning. However, despite an increasing number of learning innovations, there has been little detailed documentation of the processes involved in this format for the animation production process. More specifically, there has been little documentation and analysis of practitioners’ key considerations and issues when integrating 3D animation production process with teaching and learning tools. This study aims to examine the 3D animation production process of Desktop Application Learning System: MiLO. The Kemmis and McTaggart Action Research Model is adapted for the purpose of this study while utilizing the qualitative method of analysis in developing the 3D animation desktop application for teaching and learning. The findings of this paper proposed a new framework of the animation production process for teaching and learning applications using the iClone software. This study has also provided a new framework in the animation production process that can be applied in teaching and learning either for researchers or designers alike in various fields. Hence, this study aims to bridge the learning gap between studying from textbooks to interactive learning through using a desktop application.

1. Aburahma, M. H., & Mohamed, H. M. (2015). Educational games as a teaching tool in pharmacy curriculum. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79(4), 1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe79459
2. Darley, A. (2007). Bones of contention: Thoughts on the study of animation. Animation, 2(1), 63-76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1746847706068902
3. Gomez, K., & Gomez, L. M. (2018). Meeting in the middle: The challenge and promise of supporting stem learning through language and literacy infusion. Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(6), 258-266. doi:https://doi.org/10.20474/jahss-4.6.3
4. Grant, M. R., & Thornton, H. R. (2007). Best practices in undergraduate adult-centered online learning: Mechanisms for course design and delivery. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(4), 346–356.
5. Gray, C., & Malins, J. (2016). Visualizing research: A guide to the research process in art and design. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
6. Haris, A. (2017). Learning system management based on teaching factory in Indonesia. Journal of Advanced Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(4), 237-248. doi:https://doi.org/10.26500/jarssh-02-2017-0402
7. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart. (1988). The action research planner. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.
8. Kerlow, I. V. (2009). The art of 3D computer animation and effects. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
9. Mueller, J. R. (2017). Capturing student learning with thematic analysis. Journal of Advanced Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(6), 342-347. doi:https://doi.org/10.26500/jarssh-02-2017-0601
10. Patmore, C. (2003). The complete animation course: The principles, practice, and techniques of successful animation. Hauppauge, NY: B. E. S Publishing.
11. Raiyn, J. (2014). Developing online course based on interactive technology tools. Advances in Internet of Things, 4(3), 13–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.4236/ait.2014.43003
12. Scaramozzino, M. (2018). 3D CGI animation production process. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/360JxlP
13. Selby, A. (2013). Animation (portfolio). London, UK: Laurence King Publishing.
14. Swann, C. (2002). Action research. London, UK: Sage Publications.
15. Tuparov, G., Dureva-Tuparova, D., & Peneva, J. (2004). Didactical and technological issues during the development process of e-learning courses. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies – CompSysTech, Rousse, Bulgaria.
16. Ward, P. (2006). Some thoughts on practice-theory relationships in animation studies. Animation, 1(2), 229–245. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1746847706065845
17. Woo, P., Shahril, A. M., Azmi, E., & Rosli, H. (2018). Interactive learning online: A case study of front office teaching and learning in higher learning institution in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(15), 201-211. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i15/5101