Museums in Indonesia: Mapping their Potentials and Challenges
Volume 3, Issue 4 CIWUK MUSIANA YUDHAWASTHI
Published online:17 August 2017
Abstract
Although museums have varying collections to be managed, but they do not differ in achieving the educational objectives. The existence of a museum is highly dependent on the strength of its collections since a museum is an institution that collects, studies, displays, and interprets objects. This research constructs museums as institutions that need to present holistic learning. The occurring questions are: (1) what the potentials of the museums in Indonesia are, and (2) how the museums will be able to assess and map the implementation of educational aspects in their entire organizational management without neglecting the enjoyment and recreational objectives for their visitors. The objectives of the paper are (1) mapping the potentials of Indonesian museums, (2) presenting a conceptual working frame in assessing programs implemented by the museum through the description of the concept of education, which is called by the researcher as museum domain curriculum, (3) reporting the results of educational aspects’ description, which implicitly should be internalized by museum managers in each museum’s managerial implementation policy. To obtain information as natural as possible, where undetectable superficial phenomena may occur without any intervention of the interests of museum-related parties, the researcher uses qualitative approach by unstructured closed observation method i.e. an observation method that is carried out unknown by the subjects under observation. The study is carried out in two stages focusing on different observation areas. Stage I was carried out in 2014-2015 focusing on the observation area consisting of 248 museums in the island of Java and Stage II was carried out in 2015-2016 focusing on the observation area consisting of 186 museums spread across the islands of Sumatera, Bali, Sulawesi, Kalimantan, East Nusa Tenggara, Papua, West Nusa Tenggara, North Maluku, West Papua, and Maluku. Research instrument is made using the museum management standard as the guidelines, which later is compared to the working frame which is described based on learning domain theory to create Museum Domain Curriculum Table. Indonesia has a great variety of both tangible and intangible heritage of 633 large ethnic groups. Most museums were established to document ethnography and social history collections. Only a small number of museums concentrate on the collections of arts, design, science, technology, nature history, medical, health, sport, and past people. Unfortunately, most museums have not been able to carry out the existing information management and dissemination optimally. The museums have not been able to communicate the richness of their collection creatively. Museums in Indonesia need to overcome various challenges to make themselves into a creative industry that is capable of cooperating with various parties, forming positive brand as well as overcoming funding issues.
Reference
Andreasen, A. R. (2002). Marketing social marketing in the social change marketplace. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21(1), 3-13.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R., (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Boston, MA: Pearson Education Group.
Ayman-Nollet, S. (1988). Piaget and Vigotsky on creativity. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Coqnition, 10(4), 107-111.
Austring, B. D., & Serensen, M. C. (2010). Aesthetics and learning. Soro, Denmark: University College Zealand.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York, NY: McKay.
Bloom, B. S. (1984). The search for method of group instruction as effective as one to one tutoring. Chicago, IL: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development Educational Leadership.
Central Bureau of Statistics Indonesia. (2016). Internal report.
Cox, S., Radbourne, J., & Tidwell, P. M. (1998). Museum marketing: Implications for extending the current literature. AP-Asia Pacific Advances in Consumer Research, 3, 180-187.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Griffin, D., Abraham, M., & Crawford, J. (1999). Effective management of museums in the 1990s. Curator: The Museum Journal, 42(1), 37-53.
Hohr, H. (1998). Experience as a didactic category. Trondheim, Norway: NTNU.
Foshay, W. R. (1978). An alternative for task analysis in the affective domain. Journal of Instructional Development, 1(2), 22-24.
Harrow, A. J. (1972). A taxonomy of the psychomotor domain: A guide for developing behavior. London, UK: Longman.
ICOM. (2004). Running a museum: A practical handbook. Paris, France: ICOM.
Institute of Museum and Libraries Services. (2009). The future of museum and libraries: A discussion guide. Washington, DC, WA: IMLS.
Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook II: The affective domain. New York, NY: David McKay.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-218.
Killen, M., & Smetana, J. G. (2015). Origins and development of morality. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (pp. 701-749). New Jersey, NJ: John Wiley & Sons
Jelajah, K. (2016). Museum awards: Internal report.
Kotler, N. G., Kotler, P., & Kotler, W. I. (2008). Museum marketing and strategy(2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Frois, J. P. (2008). Lev Vygotsky’s theory of Aesthetic experience. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Martin, B. L., & Briggs, L. J. (1986). The affective and cognitive domains: Integration for instruction and research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Macdonald, J. B. (1986). The domain of curriculum. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 1(3), 205-214.
McLean, F. (1997). Marketing the museum. London, UK: Routledge.
Ministry of Environment. (2015). Internal Report.
Nucci, L. (1989). Challenging conventional wisdom about morality: The domain approach to values education. In L. Nucci (Ed.), Moral development and character education(pp. 183-203). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing.
Nucci, L. P. (2001). Education in the moral domain. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory(2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Rentschler, R., & Hede, A. M. (2007). Museum marketing: Competing in the global marketplace. Oxford, UK: ButterworthHeinemann.
Rentschler, R. (2007). Museum marketing: No longer a dirty words. In R. Rentschler & A. Hede (Eds.), Museum marketing: Competing in the global marketplace(pp. 12-18). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Rentschler, R., & Reussner, E. (2002). Museum marketing research: From denial to discovery? Oxford, UK: ButterworthHeinemann.
Simpson, E. (1972). The classification of educational objectives in the psychomotor domain: The psychomotor pomain. Washington, DC, WA: Gryphn House.
Smetana, J. G. (2006). Social-cognition moral and social judgments. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development(pp. 119-153). Abingdon, UK: Taylor and Francis.
Scott, C. (2000). Positioning museums in the 21st Century. International Journal of Arts Management, 2(3), 35-39.
University of Queensland. (1996). Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/qkKmdD
Wilson, L. O. (2002). Three domains of learning: What are the differences between the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor taxonomies? Retrieved from https://goo.gl/9nATxI
Wilson, L. O. (2013). Anderson and Krathwohl – Understanding the new version of Bloom’s Taxonomy: A succinct discussion of the revisions to Bloom’s classic cognitive taxonomy by Lorin Anderson and David Krathwohl and how to use them effectively. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/2HMwYF
To Cite this article
Yudhawasthi, C. M. (2017). Museums in Indonesia: Mapping their potentials and challenges. International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 3(4), 157-170.