The synergy of actors has become a necessity facing the flow changes and current circumstances varied between the desire of sharing between the global and the local concerning the responsibilities and commitment to meet the needs of heterogeneous territories. The limits of a single actor in front of the scale and the diversity of sectors in a changing situation require the organization of the actors, as a form of governance, in partnerships around a development project of their territory. It underlines the collective capacity of organization and territorial actions as a collective intelligence that would strengthen the cognitive dimension and would prove itself convenient to innovation. The projects of solidarity economy are a concrete proof on the ground of this territorial intelligence. Social economy projects are a concrete evidence on the ground that territorial intelligence starting from the intervention of a required number of more divergent actors in their sector. The example of the analysis of the project CLUSTER Association of local products in the Moroccan southern Sahara proves the requirement of collective intelligence in social economy projects.

1. Bilkovic, D. M., & Roggero, M. M. (2008). Effects of coastal development on nearshore estuarine nekton communities. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 358, 27-39.
   
2. Chevalier, B. (1999). Planning by project and organization of territories. Paris, France: L. Harmattan.
   
3. Chia, E., Torre, A., & Rey-Valette, H. (2008). Conclusion to a technology of territorial governance: Advocacy for a research program on the instruments and devices of territorial governance. Revue Norois, 4(209), 167-177. https://doi.org/10.4000/norois.2603
   
4. El Mnasfi, M. (2012). Urban governance and the fight against poverty in Morocco. Revue Perspectives & Societies, 3(1), 71-90.
   
5. Islam, M. A., Hossain, M. R., & Verpoest, I. (2015). A study of the effectiveness of management development program. International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 1(2), 62-69.
   
6. Jacolbia, R. B. (2016). Future educators’ perceptions on technology and livelihood education status and development of work skills. Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(2), 85-91.
   
7. Janeiro, R. D. (2012). Social innovation and sustainability, local development, entrepreneurship design. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/Bs9uVZ
   
8. Laghrissi. A (2010). Governance in Morocco, policy approach.
   
9. Ostrom, E., & Baechler, L. (2010). Governance of common goods: A new approach to natural resources. Bruxelles, Belgium: De Boeck.
   
10. Sen. A (1999). Development as freedom. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    
11. Smouts. M. C. (2008). Sustainable development: The terms of debate. Paris, France: Armand Colin.
    
12. Zaoual, H. (2011). Solidarity economy and local development: Towards a democracy of proximity. Paris, France: L. Harmattan.

Nasser, M. A. (2017). Actors’ synergy: The necessary collective intelligence for local development. International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 3(1), 9-12.