Orang Asli is the name attributed to the indigenous population originating from the hinterland of Peninsular Malaysia. Previous researchers have indicated substantial learning disengagement among the Orang Asli students. Prevalent dropouts and absenteeism were attributed to issues related to school, teachers, learners, parents, and communities. Perspectives that have been forwarded are mainly those of school heads, teachers, parents, and head of the communities; few are those that represent learners. In contrast, this paper focuses on how some others among these students have been able to complete the schooling process and beyond, successfully, despite the oft cited challenges and barriers. This paper presents a research in-progress that investigates the situation from a ‘hope’ perspective. The research is conducted qualitatively following the Grounded Theory method. Sampling was purposeful, within the context of theoretical sampling following the Grounded Theory approach. To-date, data have been gathered through unstructured interviews with fourteen (14) participants who have reached tertiary level education. This paper however, present the initial data gathered from fieldwork and interviews with the first participant, which sets the scene for the subsequent research process. The final findings are expected to provide an in-depth knowledge of the leading learning process among the successful Orang Asli students; providing baseline and benchmarks for students, parents, teachers, schools, community, and policy makers to consider for the betterment indigenous education. Finally, the study will also contribute to the body of literature that supports hope and achievement despite the deficit, among minority, indigenous community.

1. Argyris, C. (1982). Reasoning, learning, and action: Individual and organizational (pp. 85-101). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
2. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective (Vol. 173). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Berg, B. (1998). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Massachusetts, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
4. Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2011). Grounded theory: A practical guide. New York, U. S: Sage Publications.
5. Bishop, R., Berryman, M., Cavanagh, T., & Teddy, L. (2007). Te Kōtahitanga Phase 3 Whānaungatanga: Establishing a culturally responsive pedagogy of relations in mainstream secondary school classrooms. Wellington: Ministry of Education. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/c6gSdS
6. Bishop, R., Berryman, M., Wearmouth, J., Peter, M. & Clapham, S. (2011a). A summary of te kotahitanga: maintaining, replicating and sustaining change in Phase 3 and 4 schools 2007-2010. Ministry of Education New Zealand. Retrieved from https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/107825/Te-Kotahitanga-Summary.pdf
7. Bishop, R., Berryman, M., Wearmouth, J., Peter, M. & Clapham, S. (2011b). Te kotahitanga: maintaining, replicating and sustaining change: report for Phase 3 and 4 schools 2007-2010. Ministry of Education New Zealand. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/jpdvnP
8. Blueprint, M. E. (2015). Blueprint 2013-2025, preliminary report: Preschool to post-Secondary education. Ministry of Education Malaysia, Malaysia.
9. Carpentieri J. D. (2012). Family learning: A review of the research literature: A Report prepared for NIACE, national research and development centre for adult literacy and numeracy, institute of education. University of London. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/LuoCGO
10. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.
11. Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th Ed.). Milton Park, U.K: Routledge.
12. Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
13. Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3-21. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593
14. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among the five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. PMid:9566771
15. Creswell, J. W. (2007) Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among the five traditions (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Cummins, J. (1995). Power and pedagogy in the education of culturally diverse students. In Fredericskon, J. & Ada A. F. (Eds.), Reclaiming our voices: Bilingual education, critical pedagogy, and praxis (pp. 139–162). Ontario, CA: California Association for Bilingual Education.
18. Cummins, J. (2005). Language proficiency, bilingualism, and academic achievement. In Richard-Amato, P. A. & Snow, M. A. (Eds.) Academic success for English language learners (pp.76-86). New York, NY: Pearson.
19. Demming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Deming, W. E. (1994). The new economics: for industry, government and education (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
21. Desforges, C., & Abouchaar, A. (2003). The impact of parental involvement, parental support and family education on pupil achievements and adjustment: A literature review (Vol. 433). Research report.
22. Doherty, G. D. (1994). Introduction: the concern for quality. In Doherty, G. D. (Ed.), Developing quality systems in education (pp. 3-34). London: Routledge. https://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203423660_chapter_1
23. DPM. (2012). Deputy Prime Minister: Speeches – 21/06/2012- launch national education transformation Aboriginal Education Ministry. Retrieved from https://www.pmo.gov.my/tpm/?frontpage/speech/detail/1938
24. Flint, N. (2005). Methodological conundrums: Confessions of a latent grounded theorist (Doctoral dissertation). Australian Association for Research in Education, Austraila.
25. Froiland, J. M., Peterson, A., & Davison, M. L. (2012). The long-term effects of early parent involvement and parent expectation in the USA. School Psychology International, 34, 33-50.
26. Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
27. Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs Forcing. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.
28. Glaser, B. G. (2002). Conceptualization: On theory and theorizing using grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 23-38.
29. Glaser, B. G. (2006). The roots of grounded theory. The Grounded Theory Review an International Journal, 5(2/3), 1-10.
30. Glaser, Barney G. & Strauss, Anselm L. (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine. PMCid:PMC224645
31. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Leadership for learning: Does collaborative leadership make a difference in school improvement? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38(6), 654-678. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1741143210379060
32. Hoda, R. (2011). Self-organising agile teams: A grounded theory. (PhD Thesis). Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
33. Horward, D. (1994). Culturally responsive classrooms. In Harris, S. & Malin, M. (Eds.) Aboriginal kids in Urban Classroom (pp.37-50). Australia: Social Science Press.
34. Jawaid, A. (2014). Benchmarking in TESOL: A study of the Malaysia education blueprint 2013. English Language Teaching, 7(8), 23. https://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n8p23
35. Kamaruddin, K., & Jusoh, O. (2008). Educational policy and opportunities of Orang Asli: A study on indigenious people in Malaysia. Journal Human Resource Adult Learn, 4(1), 86-97.
36. KKLW. (2011). Official portal of orang asli development department, ministry of rural and regional development. Jabatan Kemajuan Orang Asli, Malaysia.
37. KPM. (2008). Education for all mid decade assessment report 2000-2007. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (Ministry of Education, Malaysia).
38. Ladson‐Billings, G. (1995). But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 159-165. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405849509543675
39. Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Wahlstrom, K. L., & Anderson, S. E. (2010). Learning from leadership: investigating the links to improved student learning. Final Report on Research to the Wallace Foundation.
40. Mahmud, Z., Amat, S., & Yaacob, M. (2009). Educational Issues of Orang Asli Students in Malaysia. International Journal of Diversity in Organisations, Communities & Nations, 8(6), 121-128.
41. Malaysia, E. P. U. (2011). Malaysia: The millenium development goals at 2010. Kuala Lumpur: United Nations Country Team, Malaysia, 134.
42. McCallin, A. (2003). Grappling with the literature in a grounded theory study. Contemporary Nurse, 15(1-2), 61-69. https://dx.doi.org/10.5172/conu.15.1-2.61 PMid:14649509
43. McCallin, A. M. (2006). Methodological Issues: Have we forgotten the place of thinking here? The Grounded Theory Review: An International Journal, 2(3), 51-57.
44. Md Nor, S., Roslan, S., Mohamed, A., Hassan, A., Hj, K., Ali, M. A. M., & Manaf, J. A. (2011). Dropout prevention initiatives for Malaysian indigenous Orang Asli children. International Journal on School Disaffection, 8(1), 42-56.
45. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons. https://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-7409-7.ch007
46. Moreland, N., Jawaid, A., & Dhillon, J. (2000). Quality improvement in the TESOL curriculum: a generic benchmarking approach. Quality Assurance in Education, 8(2), 57-62. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09684880010325484
47. Morrow, S. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 250. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250
48. Mughal, A. J. (1998). A framework for the improvement of TESOL curriculum in Lahore, Pakistan, based upon a comparative analysis of TESOL in Birmingham, UK (Doctoral dissertation, University of Wolverhampton).
49. Nelson, S. (2002). Learn-Ed nations inventory-a tool for improving schools with American Indian and Alaska native students. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, USA. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/YZ9Bof
50. Neufeldt, V., & Guralnik, D. B. (1994). Webster’s New World Dictionary of American English. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
51. Nicholas, C. (2009). The state of Orang Asli education and its root problems. Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM), Malaysia.
52. Noora, M. A. M. (2012). Advancing the Orang Asli through Malaysia’s clusters of excellence policy. Journal of International and Comparative Education, 1(2), 2232-1802.
53. OCDE. (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world: First results from PISA 2003. Organization For Economic Co-Operation And Development, France.
54. Peters, M., Seeds, K., Goldstein, A. & Coleman, N. (2008). Parental involvement in children’s education. BMRB International Ltd., U.k.
55. Richard-Amato, P. A. and Snow, M. A. (Eds.) (2005). Academic Success for English Language Learners: Strategies for K-12 Mainstream Teachers. New York, NY: Pearson.
56. Scholtes, P. R., (1998). The leader’s handbook: Making things happen, getting things done. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
57. Seashore, K., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K., & Anderson, S. (2010). Investigating the links to improved student learning: Final report of research findings. University of Minnesota, Canada.
58. Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practise of The Learning Organisation: Century Business. New York, NY: Currency Doubleday.
59. Sidorkin, A. M. (2002). Learning relations: Impure education, deschooled schools, and dialogue with evil. New York, NY: Peter Lang. PMid:12214502
60. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedure and techniques (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
61. Suddaby, R. (2006). From the editors: What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 633-642.
62. Tikly, L. (2010). Towards a framework for understanding the quality of education. Bristol, UK: University of Bristol. PMCid:PMC3061216
63. Tribus, M. (1994). Total quality management in education, the theory and how to put it to work–developing quality systems. In Geoffrey D. (Ed.). Developing quality systems in education (pp. 3-34). London, UK: Routledge.
64. UNICEF (2000a). Defining quality in education. A paper presented by UNICEF at the meeting of the International Working Group on Education, Florence, Italy. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/education/files/QualityEducation.PDF
65. Valencia, R. R. (2010). Dismantling contemporary deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
66. Valencia, R. R. (Ed.). (1997). The evolution of deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. London, UK: Falmer Press.
67. Villegas, A. M., & Lucas, T. (2002). Educating culturally responsive teachers: A coherent approach. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
68. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard university press.
69. Vygotsky, L. (2005). Interaction between learning and development. In Richard-Amato, P. A. and Snow, M. A. (Eds.) Academic success for English language learners (pp.103-111). New York: Pearson.
70. Yin, R. K. (2012). Applications of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
71. Zairi, M., & Leonard, P. (1994). Practical Benchmarking: The Complete Guide: A Complete Guide. Springer Science & Business Media.

Rabahi, M., Yusof, H., & Awang, M. (2016). Model of Hope: Leading Learning among the Indigenous Orang Asli Students. International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 2(1), 1-12.