Paul Auster’s “City of Glass” (1985) has been widely described as a postmodern detective novella. The work has provoked debate about postmodern literary devices such as metafiction, fictional worlds, and the economics of language and signified meanings. My reading on postmodernism in “City of Glass” focuses on how the novella departs from modernism, particularly within the urban setting of New York as a depersonalizing site of dominant capitalist signs. Simmel (1971) famously said that the city dweller develops a “protective organ” in the metropolitan environment, which was also echoed by his student Benjamin (1968). I will emphasize that while the protagonist Daniel Quinn does not exhibit Simmel’s blase attitude, he constructs a sense of self or Being in the context of the city in opposition to a criminal other. Auster draws particular focus on the dyadic relationship through the investigator and criminal figures that are comparable to a Sartrean notion of the other, essentially characterized by conflict and a will to appropriate/exterminate the other. “City of Glass” raises interesting implications for how Being is constructed amid the plethora of urban stimuli and crowds within a postmodern framework. “The other is of interest to me only to the extent that he is another Me, a Me-object for Me, and conversely to the extent that he reflects my Me” (Sartre, 1956).

1. Auster, P. (1990). The New York trilogy. New York: NY, Penguin Classics.
2. Baudrillard, J. (1996). The perfect crime. UK: Verso.
3. Brown, M. (2007). Paul Auster. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press. https://dx.doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9780719073960.001.0001
4. Benjamin, W. (1968). On some motifs in baudelaire (Trans. Harry Zohn). In H. Arendt (Ed.), Illuminations (pp. 155-200). New
   York, NY: Schocken Books.
5. Derrida, J. (1982). Margins of philosophy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
6. Derrida, J. (1997). Of grammatology. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.
7. Dimovitz, S. A. (1990). Public personae and the private I: De-compositional ontology. In P. Auster (Ed.), The New York trilogy. New York: NY, Penguin Classics.
8. Herzogenrath, B. (1999). An art of desire: Reading Paul Auster. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
9. Lacan, J. (1972). The insistence of the letter in the unconscious. In R. T. De George (Ed.), The structuralists: From Marx to Levi-Strauss (pp. 287-323). Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
10. Rowen, N. (1991). The detective in search of the lost tongue of Adam. In P. Auster (Ed.), City of Glass. New York: NY, Penguin Books.
11. Sartre, J. P. B. (1956). Being and nothingness: An essay on phenomenological ontology. (Trans. Hazel E. Barnes.) New York: NY, Philosophical Library. PMid:15444905
12. Simmel, G. (1971). The metropolis and mental life. In D. N. Levine (Ed.), G. Simmel: On individuality and social forms; selected
    writings (pp. 324-339). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
13. Waugh, P. (1990). Metafiction: The theory and practice of self-conscious fiction. UK: Routledge.

Yoon, S. (2016). Being in the city: A postmodern reading of Paul Auster’s City of Glass. International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 2(3), 98-100.