Traits of Personality and Age of Marriage as Predictors for Psychological Needs to Use
Social Networks
Volume 2, Issue 2
LISFARIKA NAPITUPULU
Published online: 24 April 2016
Article Views: 16
Abstract
This research aimed to determine the effects of personality traits and age on psychological needs to use social networks. Psychological needs to use social networks is conditions or desires to someone to use social networks. Personality Trait is a description of behaviours that can be grouped into five types: neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, conscientiousness, and agreeableness. The age of marriage starts from the day when the couple has married. Age of marriage is reflected in the family cycle phase. This research is quantitative. Subjects in this study were 94, which consisted of 80 women and 14 men. All of them live in Pekanbaru-Riau. The subject was determined by incidental sampling technique. This research was conducted at Pekanbaru. The hypotheses tested were (1) personality trait and age of marriage as predictors for psychological needs to use social networks, (2) type of personality is a predictor for psychological needs to use social networks (3) age of marriage is a predictor of psychological needs to use social networks. The obtained data had been analyzed by two way ANOVA. The Finding revealed that personality trait and age of marriage effect psychological needs to use social networks, with contribution is 7.4%; F= 3.644; p= 0.030 (0.03<0.05). Personality trait has no effect on the psychological needs using social networks (β = 0195, p>0.05) and the age of marriage affect on the psychological need to use social network (β=-.216, p<0.05).
References
Adithyaa, M. T. (2010). What is the first social networking site on the web? Retrieved from https://goo.gl/32KVqw
Baker, S. (2015). Why do people use online social networking. Retrieved from www.academia.edu
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 PMid:7777651
Cloninger, S. C. (2013). Theories of personality: Undertanding persons (6th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
Iryna, S. (2012). Family and marital satisfaction and the use of social network technologies (Doctoral dissertation). Illnois, IL: Univeristy of Illnois.
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin, & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research. New York/London: Guilford Press.
Kosinski, M., Bachrach, Y., Kohli, P., Stillwell, D., & Graepel, T. (2014). Manifestations of user personality in website choice and behaviour on online social networks. Machine Learning, 95(3), 357-380. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10994-013-5415-y
Langstedt, E. (2011). An examination of the five factor model personality traits as predictors of online social network use (Unpublished dissertion). University of Connecticut, Mansfield, US.
Livermore, C., R. (Ed.). (2008). Social networking communities and e-dating services: Concepts and implications. Pennsylvania, PA: Yurchak Printing.
Mouakket, S. (2015). Perceived usefulness of facebook: Effects of personality traits and gender. Journal of Advances in Information Technology, 6(3), 111-117. https://dx.doi.org/10.12720/jait.6.3.111-117
Pervin, L. A., Cervovne, D., & John, O. P. (2012). Personality psychology: Theory and research. Indonesia: Prenada Media. PMCid:PMC3495045
Rivas, A. (2013). Too much facebook can cause relationships to end in cheating, breakups or divorce. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/QN90Od
Witkin, N. D. (2014). The role of personality, attachment and narcisim, in regards to social networking: An examination of social network users (Doctrol dissertation). Alliant International University, San Diego, US.
To Cite this article
Napitupulu, L. (2016). Traits of personality and age of marriage as predictors for psychological needs to use social networks. International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, 2(2), 65-72.