business-v8-i1-Article 2 – KKG PUBLICATIONS

Impact of Shared Cognition on Team Effectiveness with Mediating Role of Intra-Team Communication: A Study on Organizational Teams

Volume 8, Issue 1
Sobia Mahmood, Muhammad Ahmed, Fiza Ahmed

Published online: 27 March 2022

Article Views: 20

AbstractReferencesCite

Many corporate organizations in Pakistan have now started to create teams who work to achieve a single goal to improve the effectiveness and overall productivity of the organization. Many factors can impact the effectiveness of these teams. This research paper analyzes the impact of shared cognition on team effectiveness with the mediating role of intra-team communication on organizational teams in Pakistan. This paper will help the managers understand how they can improve their team’s efficiency and make their teams more effective. The approach used in this research paper is quantitative. The information for this research is gathered through the interrogation technique, where surveys were collected from organizational team members. The sample size for this research is 208 organizational team members, and non-probability sampling has been used. The data is collected through convenience sampling, and its analysis is done through Microsoft Excel and SPSS. Correlation and regression were conducted to determine the relationship between variables, and regression through the Hayes model observed the mediation effect. Significant values have helped to determine if the hypothesis mentioned in the report can be accepted or not. The research concludes that the causal relationship of shared cognition leading to intra-team communication does significantly impact team effectiveness. Managers can integrate these concepts into their organizational teams to make them more effective. These results indicate that for managers to improve team effectiveness in their organizational teams, they need to focus on the shared cognition of team members. Team effectiveness and the organization’s overall performance can improve if members have a shared cognition

Amin, S., Kamal, Y., & Sohail, A. (2016). The relationship between transformational leadership and project team performance: Assessing the mediating role of a project team management education. Apeejay Journal of Management Sciences and Technology, 3(3), 1–12.
Bushe, G. R., & Coetzer, G. H. (2007). Group development and team effectiveness: Using cognitive representations to measure group development and predict task performance and group viability. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(2), 184–212. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886306298892
Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46(4), 823–847. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb01571.x
Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (2001). Reflections on shared cognition. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 22(2), 195–202. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/job.82
Chen, M.-H., Chang, Y.-Y., & Chang, Y.-C. (2017). The trinity of entrepreneurial team dynamics: Cognition, conflicts and cohesion. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(6), 934-951. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-07-2016-0213
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
Danish, R. Q., Aslam, N., Shahid, A. U., Bashir, F., & Tariq, S. (2015). Impact of team characteristics on team performance in banking sector of Pakistan. The Journal of Commerce, 7(4), 183-199.
Daspit, J., Tillman, C. J., Boyd, N. G., & Mckee, V. (2013). Cross-functional team effectiveness: An examination of internal team environment, shared leadership, and cohesion influences. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 19(1), 34-56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/13527591311312088
DeChurch, L. A., & Mesmer-Magnus, J. R. (2010). The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 32-53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017328
de Jong, R., Schalk, R., & Cur¸seu, P. L. (2008). Virtual communicating, conflicts and performance in teams. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 14(7), 364-380. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/13527590810912331
DeOrtentiis, P. S., Summers, J. K., Ammeter, A. P., Douglas, C., & Ferris, G. R. (2013). Cohesion and satisfaction as mediators of the team trust–team effectiveness relationship: An interdependence theory perspective. Career Development International, 18(5), 521-543. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-03-2013-0035
Fletcher, T. D., & Major, D. A. (2006). The effects of communication modality on performance and self-ratings of teamwork components. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 557–576. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00027.x
Forgas, J. P. (1981). Social cognition: Perspectives on everyday understanding. London, UK: Academic Press.
Gibson, C. B., Zellmer-Bruhn, M. E., & Schwab, D. P. (2003). Team effectiveness in multinational organizations: Evaluation across contexts. Group & Organization Management, 28(4), 444–474. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601103251685
Gorman, J. C., Grimm, D. A., & Dunbar, T. A. (2018). Defining and measuring team effectiveness in dynamic environments and implications for team ITS. In Building intelligent tutoring systems for teams. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/S1534-085620180000019007
Greer, L. L., de Jong, B. A., Schouten, M. E., & Dannals, J. E. (2018). Why and when hierarchy impacts team effectiveness: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(6), 591-613. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000291
Guzzo, R. A., & Shea, G. P. (1992). Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Hackman, J. R. (1978). The design of work in the 1980s. Organizational Dynamics, 7(1), 3–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(78)90031-1
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Multivariate data analysis. Bookman Editora.
Henttonen, K., Johanson, J.-E., & Janhonen, M. (2014). Work-team bonding and bridging social networks, team identity and performance effectiveness. Personnel Review, 43(3), 330-349. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-12-2011-0187
Kirschenhofer, F., & Lechner, C. (2012). Performance drivers of serial entrepreneurs: Entrepreneurial and team experience. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 18(3), 305-329. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/13552551211227693
Leenders, R. T. A., Van Engelen, J. M., & Kratzer, J. (2003). Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: A social network perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20(1-2), 69–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-4748(03)00005-5
Lubowiecki-Vikuk, A. (2020). Business culture in central and eastern european countries: The role of the manager’s etiquette and image. International Journal of Business and Economic Affairs, 5(2), 52–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.24088/ijbea-2020-52001
Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 273-283. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.273
Matteson, M. (2010). The impact of group interaction on shared cognition: An analysis of small group communication. In Advances in library administration and organization. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/S0732-0671(2010)0000029005
McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance (Vol. 14). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Mohammed, S., & Dumville, B. C. (2001). Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: Expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 22(2), 89–106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/job.86
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533225
Park, H. S. (2008). The effects of shared cognition on group satisfaction and performance: Politeness and efficiency in group interaction. Communication Research, 35(1), 88–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650207309363
Parlamis, J., & Dibble, R. (2019). Teaming: Are two communication modes better than one? Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 25(5), 318-333. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-10-2018-0065
Purvanova, R. K., & Kenda, R. (2021). The impact of virtuality on team effectiveness in organizational and non-organizational teams: A meta-analysis (just accepted). Applied Psychology. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12348
Ross, T. M., Jones, E. C., & Adams, S. G. (2008). Can team effectiveness be predicted? Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 14(5), 248-268. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/13527590810898518
Stewart, G. L., & Barrick, M. R. (2000). Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 135–148. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/1556372
Stout, R. J., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Milanovich, D. M. (1999). Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: An empirical link is established. Human Factors, 41(1), 61–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1518/001872099779577273
Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464–476. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/257085

Mahmood, S., Ahmed, M., & Ahmed, F. (2022). Impact of shared cognition on team effectiveness with mediating role of intra-team communication: A study on organizational teams. International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, 8(1), 12-21. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.20469/ijbas.8.10002-1