Change is an inevitable reality for any organization to adapt to the changes successfully, and employees should be willing to cooperate during the change process. The objectives of this study are to investigate the relationship between Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) and employee Affective Commitment to Change (ACC) and how Psychological Empowerment (PE) moderates the above relationship. Data were collected from 132 employees working in various organizations. The data was collected through structured questionnaires from employees working in Lahore, Pakistan. The results indicate that LMX and PE have significant positive impacts on ACC. Furthermore, PE acting as moderator strengthens the direct influences of LMX on ACC. In light of the study’s findings, organizations need to ensure the development of the dyadic relationship between supervisors and employees. Leaders who foster a healthy relationship with employees are considered to be most effective during the change process. Organizations should take into account the role of empowerment and accordingly implement strategies that encourage its occurrence.

1. Aarons, G. A., Ehrhart, M. G., Farahnak, L. R., & Hurlburt, M. S. (2015). Leadership and Organizational Change for Implementation (LOCI): A randomized mixed method pilot study of a leadership and organization development intervention for evidence-based practice implementation. Implementation Science, 10(1), 11.
2. Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E., & Teasdale, J. D. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87(1), 49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.87.1.49
3. Aghaei, N., & Savari, M. (2014). The relationship between psychological empowerment and professional commitment of selected physical education teachers in Khuzestan province, Iran. European Journal of Experimental Biology, 4(4), 147–155.
4. Ahmed, B., & Tariq, H. (2017). Do transformational leadership and employee learning orientation lead to organizational innovation? The moderating role of psychological empowerment. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 6(2), 178-194.
5. Amarantou, V., Kazakopoulou, S., Chatzoudes, D., & Chatzoglou, P. (2018). Resistance to change: An empirical investigation of its antecedents. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31(2), 426-450. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-05-2017-0196
6. Arefin, M. S., Arif, I., & Raquib, M. (2015). High-performance work systems and proactive behavior: The mediating role of psychological empowerment. International Journal of Business and Management, 10(3), 132–140. doi:https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v10n3p132
7. Armenakis, A. A., & Bedeian, A. G. (1999). Organizational change: A review of theory and research in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25(3), 293–315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639902500303
8. Avolio, B. J., Zhu, W., Koh, W., & Bhatia, P. (2004). Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: Mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(8), 951–968. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/job.283
9. Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(1), 45–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/job.179
10. Bernerth, J. (2004). Expanding our understanding of the change message. Human Resource Development Review, 3(1), 36–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484303261230
11. Bernerth, J. B., Armenakis, A. A., Feild, H. S., & Walker, H. J. (2007). Justice, cynicism, and commitment: A study of important organizational change variables. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(3), 303–326. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886306296602
12. Cameron, K., & McNaughtan, J. (2014). Positive organizational change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(4), 445-462. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886314549922
13. Cartwright, S., & Cooper, C. L. (1993). The psychological impact of merger and acquisition on the individual: A study of building society managers. Human relations, 46(3), 327–347. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600302
14. Chan, S. C. (2017). Benevolent leadership, perceived supervisory support, and subordinates’ performance. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 38(7), 897-911. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-09-2015-0196
15. Choi, M. (2011). Employees’ attitudes toward organizational change: A literature review. Human Resource Management, 50(4), 479–500. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20434
16. Conner, D. (1993). Managing at the speed of change: How resilient managers succeed and prosper where others fail. New York, NY: Random House.
17. Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
18. Eby, L. T., Adams, D. M., Russell, J. E., & Gaby, S. H. (2000). Perceptions of organizational readiness for change: Factors related to employees’ reactions to the implementation of team-based selling. Human Relations, 53(3), 419–442. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700533006
19. Eisenberger, R., Karagonlar, G., Stinglhamber, F., Neves, P., Becker, T. E., Gonzalez-Morales, M. G., & Steiger-Mueller, M. (2010). Leader–member exchange and affective organizational commitment: The contribution of supervisor’s organizational embodiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1085. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020858
20. Endrejat, P. C., Müller, L., Klonek, F. E., & Kauffeld, S. (2017). How to respond to resistance to change? An analysis of change agents’ communication behaviors. In Academy of management proceedings (Vol. 2017, p. 14281). doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2017.14281abstract
21. Etschmaier, G. S. (2010). Mergers and acquisitions as instruments of strategic change management in higher education: Assessment measures and perceptions of success. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
22. Fernandez, S., & Pitts, D. W. (2007). Under what conditions do public managers favor and pursue organizational change? The American Review of Public Administration, 37(3), 324–341. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074006293467
23. Foks, M. (2015). Antecedents of commitment to change: a study about the contribution of change related variables, individual variables, communication variables and work-relationships to employees’ commitment to organizational change (Master thesis). University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
24. Fugate, M. (2012). The impact of leadership, management, and HRM on employee reactions to organizational change. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 31(1), 177–208. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/S0742-7301(2012)0000031007
25. Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322
26. Garg, S., & Dhar, R. L. (2016). Extra-role customer service: The roles of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX), affective commitment, and psychological empowerment. International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration, 17(4), 373–396. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15256480.2016.1226151
27. Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827-844.
28. Goksoy, A. (2017). The role of psychological empowerment and organizational citizenship behaviors on employee resistance to change. European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 3(2), 85–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.26417/ejis.v7i2.p85-93
29. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. , 6(2), 219-247. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
30. Grant, A. M., Fried, Y., & Juillerat, T. (2011). Work matters: Job design in classic and contemporary perspectives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/12169-013
31. Hackman, . O. G. R., J. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, PA: Addison-Wesley.
32. Harris, K. J., Wheeler, A. R., & Kacmar, K. M. (2009). Leader-member exchange and empowerment: Direct and interactive effects on job satisfaction, turnover intentions, and performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 371–382. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.006
33. Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 451–470. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12028
34. Herold, D. M., Fedor, D. B., Caldwell, S., & Liu, Y. (2008). The effects of transformational and change leadership on employees’ commitment to a change: A multilevel study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 346. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.346
35. Herscovitch, L., & Meyer, J. P. (2002). Commitment to organizational change: Extension of a three-component model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 474. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.474
36. Holt, D. T., Armenakis, A. A., Feild, H. S., & Harris, S. G. (2007). Readiness for organizational change: The systematic development of a scale. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(2), 232–255. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886306295295
37. Hornstein, H. A. (2015). The integration of project management and organizational change management is now a necessity. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 291–298. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.08.005
38. Karl, K. A. (1996). The human side of change: A practical guide to organization redesign. Academy of Management Perspectives, 10(3), 68-69. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1996.9704111478
39. Lavelle, J. J., Brockner, J., Konovsky, M. A., Price, K. H., Henley, A. B., Taneja, A., & Vinekar, V. (2009). Commitment, procedural fairness, and organizational citizenship behavior: A multifoci analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(3), 337–357. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/job.518
40. Liao, H., Liu, D., & Loi, R. (2010). Looking at both sides of the social exchange coin: A social cognitive perspective on the joint effects of relationship quality and differentiation on creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 1090–1109. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.54533207
41. Liden, R. C., Erdogan, B., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2006). Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: Implications for individual and group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(6), 723–746. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/job.409
42. Liu, F., Chow, I. H.-S., Zhang, J.-C., & Huang, M. (2019). Organizational innovation climate and individual innovative behavior: Exploring the moderating effects of psychological ownership and psychological empowerment. Review of Managerial Science, 13(4), 771–789. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0263-y
43. Liu, Y. (2010). When change leadership impacts commitment to change and when it doesn’t, a multi-level multi-dimensional investigation. Atlanta, Georgia: George Institute of Technology.
44. Mangundjaya, W. (2013). Organizational commitment’s profile during the transformation and its relation to employee commitment to change (a study at oil company in indonesia during large-scale organizational change). In INBAM Conference, Lisbon, Portugal.
45. Mangundjaya, W., Utoyo, D. B., & Wulandari, P. (2015). The role of leadership and employee’s condition on reaction to organizational change. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 471–478. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.385
46. Morin, A. J., Meyer, J. P., Bélanger, É., Boudrias, J.-S., Gagné, M., & Parker, P. D. (2016). Longitudinal associations between employees’ beliefs about the quality of the change management process, affective commitment to change and psychological empowerment. Human Relations, 69(3), 839–867. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715602046
47. Neves, P., & Caetano, A. (2009). Commitment to change: Contributions to trust in the supervisor and work outcomes. Group & Organization Management, 34(6), 623–644. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601109350980
48. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.
49. Oreg, S. (2006). Personality, context, and resistance to organizational change. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(1), 73–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320500451247
50. Oreg, S., Vakola, M., & Armenakis, A. (2011). Change recipients’ reactions to organizational change: A 60-year review of quantitative studies. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47(4), 461–524. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886310396550
51. Özarallı, N. (2015). Linking empowering leader to creativity: The moderating role of psychological (felt) empowerment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 181, 366–376. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.899
52. Pieterse, A. N., Van Knippenberg, D., Schippers, M., & Stam, D. (2010). Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior: The moderating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4), 609–623. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/job.650
53. Randolph, W. A. (1995). Navigating the journey to empowerment. Organizational Dynamics, 23(4), 19–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(95)90014-4
54. Russ, T. L. (2008). Communicating change: A review and critical analysis of programmatic and participatory implementation approaches. Journal of Change Management, 8(3-4), 199–211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010802594604
55. Schriesheim, C. A., Castro, S. L., & Cogliser, C. C. (1999). Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(1), 63–113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(99)80009-5
56. Sejera, S. G. (2018). Culturally derived leadership qualities: Dispositional eesilience among societies. Journal of Administrative and Business Studies, 4(2), 81-89. doi:https://doi.org/10.20474/jabs-4.2.3
57. Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/256865
58. Spreitzer, G. M. (2008). Taking stock: A review of more than twenty years of research on empowerment at work. In J. Barling & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), The sage handbook of organizational behavior. New York, NY: SAGE.
59. Thompson, L. (2018). The roles of lmx, readiness for change and organizational trust on employee behaviours: The moderating effects of organizational support constructs (Tech. Rep.). Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
60. Uhl-Bien, M., Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (2000). Implications of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) for strategic human resource management systems: Relationships as social capital for competitive advantage. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 18, 137–186.
61. Ukpe, I. (2018). Psychological empowerment and employee involvement in organizational change: The role of commitment to change. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Capella University.
62. UNC, E. D. (2015). Why change initiatives fail. Chapel Hill, NC: Kenan-Flagler Business School.
63. Vakola, M. (2014). What’s in there for me? individual readiness to change and the perceived impact of organizational change. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 35(3), 195-209. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-05-2012-0064
64. Van der Voet, J., & Vermeeren, B. (2017). Change management in hard times: Can change management mitigate the negative relationship between cutbacks and the organizational commitment and work engagement of public sector employees? The American Review of Public Administration, 47(2), 230–252. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074015625828
65. Vigoda, E., & Cohen, A. (2003). Work congruence and excellence in human resource management: Empirical evidence from the israeli nonprofit sector. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 23(3), 192–216. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X03252436
66. Visagie, C., & Steyn, C. (2011). Organisational commitment and responses to planned organisational change: An exploratory study. Southern African Business Review, 15(3), 98–121.
67. Wang, D., Gan, C., & Wu, C. (2016). LMX and employee voice: A moderated mediation model of psychological empowerment and role clarity. Personnel Review, 45(3), 605-615. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-2014-0255
68. Wen, L., Zhou, M., & Lu, Q. (2015). Creative leadership and creativity: Mediating role of LMX and moderating role of psychological empowerment. Information Management and Management Engineering, 94, 269. doi:https://doi.org/10.2495/IMME140331
69. Whelan-Berry, K. S., Gordon, J. R., & Hinings, C. (2003). The relative effect of change drivers in large-scale organizational change: An empirical study. In Research in organizational change and development. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0897-3016(03)14081-5
70. Wright, B. E., Christensen, R. K., & Isett, K. R. (2013). Motivated to adapt? The role of public service motivation as employees face organizational change. Public Administration Review, 73(5), 738–747. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12078
71. Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107–128. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.48037118
72. Zhou, L., Wang, M., Chen, G., & Shi, J. (2012). Supervisors’ upward exchange relationships and subordinate outcomes: Testing the multilevel mediation role of empowerment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 668. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026305
73. Zhou, S., Siriboonchitta, S., Yamaka, W., & Maneejuk, P. (2020). The impact of cultural industry on economic and employment growth in China. Journal of Administrative and Business Studies, 6(4), 129-137. doi:https://doi.org/10.20474/jabs-6.4.3

Rizvi, F., Farooq, W., Ahmed, I. (2020). LMX and affective commitment to change: Moderating role of psychological empowerment. International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, 6(5), 275-285. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.20469/ijbas.6.10005-5