KKG PUBLICATIONS
  • Home
  • Journals
    • BUSINESS & ADMINISTRATIVE STUDIES
    • HUMANITIES, ARTS & SOCIAL SCIENCES
    • TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING STUDIES
    • APPLIED SCIENCES
    • MEDICAL SCIENCES
  • Publishing Ethics
  • Privacy Policy
  • Crossmark Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Journals
    • BUSINESS & ADMINISTRATIVE STUDIES
    • HUMANITIES, ARTS & SOCIAL SCIENCES
    • TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING STUDIES
    • APPLIED SCIENCES
    • MEDICAL SCIENCES
  • Publishing Ethics
  • Privacy Policy
  • Crossmark Policy
  • Contact Us
  • https://evolua.ispcaala.com/
  • https://portal-indonesia.id/
  • https://sipena.rsjrw.id/
  • https://www.ijecom.org/
  • https://askimahciwimandiri.co.id/
  • http://lapassumbawa.com/
  • https://spartan.mizoram.gov.in/
  • https://ejournal.neurona.web.id/
  • https://e-journal.staibta.ac.id/
  • http://ilim.not.kg/
  • http://journals.ieu.kiev.ua/
  • https://ojs.uhnsugriwa.ac.id/
  • https://jurnal.jalaberkat.com/
  • https://siami.uki.ac.id/
  • https://amr.lgu.edu.pk/
  • https://simpeg.padangpanjang.go.id/
  • https://analis.poltekkes-smg.net/
  • https://perhepi.org/

Preliminary Investigations into the Factors Affecting Successful Implementation of Project Management Frameworks and its Effects on Project Success: Evidence from Ghana



Volume 6, Issue 5
Ivy Hawah Taana, Valliappan Raju

Published online: 25 October 2020
Article Views: 20

Abstract

Whether undertaken by a public or private organization, the successful completion of every project is of primary concern. However, literature has confirmed that most project success depends on adhering to good practices and are keenly documented in the Project Management Frameworks (PMFs). The purpose of this study is to explore the factors that affect the implementation of PMFs in Ghana. This is motivated by the dearth of academic literature concerning PMFs and their successful implementation in Ghana. A conceptual framework was developed grounded on the Capability Maturity Model (CMM) and the Critical Success Factors (CSFs) theory to achieve this aim. Four independent variables and the dependent variable were hypothesized to be tested to establish the success factors affecting PMFs implementation. Data were collected from 105 project management consultants, contractors, and other key stakeholders in Ghana and analyzed to establish the relationships between the hypothesized constructs. The findings indicate that Stakeholder Involvement (SI) and Top Management Support (TMS) influence the adoption of PMFs. However, Acceptability and Organizational Maturity (OM) does not influence the adoption of PMFs. Moreover, PMFs does not influence Project Success. This preliminary study has given us insights into the factors to consider when adopting PMFs in Ghana. Practically, key stakeholders should encourage project management consultants and contractors to accept the PMFs, which, when adhered to, will lead to project success which is contrary to what this study found.

References

  1. Abdul-Aziz, A.-R., & Kassim, P. J. (2011). Objectives, success and failure factors of housing public–private partnerships in Malaysia. Habitat International, 35(1), 150–157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.06.005
  2. Abdurrahaman, D. T., Owusu, A., & Bakare, A. S. (2020). Evaluating factors affecting user satisfaction in university Enterprise Content Management (ECM) systems. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 23(1), 1-16. doi:https://doi.org/10.34190/EJISE.20.23.1.001
  3. Acheampong, O., & Moyaid, S. A. (2016). An integrated model for determining business intelligence systems adoption and post-adoption benefits in banking sector. Journal of Administrative and Business Studies, 2(2), 84–100. doi:https://doi.org/10.20474/jabs-2.2.4
  4. Ahlemann, F., Teuteberg, F., & Vogelsang, K. (2009). Project management standards–diffusion and application in Germany and Switzerland. International Journal of Project Management, 27(3), 292–303. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.01.009
  5. Alreemy, Z., Chang, V., Walters, R., & Wills, G. (2016). Critical Success Factors (CSFs) for Information Technology Governance (ITG). International Journal of Information Management, 36(6), 907–916. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.05.017
  6. Amponsah, R., & Darmoe, J. (2014). A study of the critical success factors influencing projects in the Ghana public sector. The International Journal of Business & Management, 2(5), 120.
  7. Backlund, F., Chronéer, D., & Sundqvist, E. (2014). Project management maturity models–a critical review: A case study within swedish engineering and construction organizations. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119(0), 837–846. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.094
  8. Bakare, A. S., Owusu, A., & Abdurrahaman, D. T. (2017). The behavior response of the Nigerian youths toward mobile advertising: An examination of the influence of values, attitudes and culture. Cogent Business & Management, 4(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2017.1353231
  9. Bal, M., Bryde, D., Fearon, D., & Ochieng, E. (2013). Stakeholder engagement: Achieving sustainability in the construction sector. Sustainability, 5(2), 695–710. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su5020695
  10. Banica, L., Radulescu, M., Rosca, D., & Hagiu, A. (2017). Is devops another project management methodology? Informatica Economica, 21(3), 39. doi:https://doi.org/10.12948/issn14531305/21.3.2017.04
  11. Becker, J., Niehaves, B., Poeppelbuss, J., & Simons, A. (2010). Maturity models in is research. In ECIS 2010 Proceedings, Pretoria, South Africa.
  12. Beeby, A., Fernández, M., Fox, O., Albir, A., Kozlova, I., Kuznik, A., . . . Wimmer, S. (2009). Results of the validation of the PACTE translation competence model: Acceptability and decision making. Across Languages and Cultures, 10(2), 207–230. doi:https://doi.org/10.1556/Acr.10.2009.2.3
  13. Bosher, L., Dainty, A., Carrillo, P., & Glass, J. (2007). Built-in resilience to disasters: A pre-emptive approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 14(5), 434-446. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980710780746
  14. Collins, A., & Baccarini, D. (2004). Project success—a survey. Journal of Construction Research, 5(02), 211–231. doi:https://doi.org/10.1142/S1609945104000152
  15. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
  16. Farrokh, J., & Mansur, A. K. (2013). Project management maturity models and organizational project management maturity model (opm3R): A critical morphological evaluation. Project Management, 2(7), 23–33.
  17. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3150980
  18. Geisser, S. (1974). A predictive approach to the random effect model. Biometrika, 61(1), 101–107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/61.1.101
  19. Gomes, J., & Romão, M. (2014). How organizational maturity and project management can cooperate for project success. Faro, Portugal: UALg ESGHT.
  20. Grisham, T. W. (2009). International project management: Leadership in complex environments. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  21. Hachimi, A., & Salahddine, M. M. A. (2019). The acceptability of participatory banking products by SMES: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 9(4), 259. doi:https://doi.org/10.32479/ijefi.8227
  22. Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
  23. Heravitorbati, A., Coffey, V., Trigunarsyah, B., & Saghatforoush, E. (2011). Evaluating the influences of stakeholder management on construction project quality. In Proceedings of 1st International Construction Business & Management Symposium, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  24. Hsu, H.-Y., Liu, F.-H., Tsou, H.-T., & Chen, L.-J. (2019). Openness of technology adoption, top management support and service innovation: A social innovation perspective. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 34(3), 575-590. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-03-2017-0068
  25. Hu, J., & Gao, S. (2019). Research and application of capability maturity model for chinese intelligent manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 83, 794–799. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.05.013
  26. Ilyas, S., Hu, Z., & Wiwattanakornwong, K. (2020). Unleashing the role of top management and government support in green supply chain management and sustainable development goals. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(8), 8210–8223. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07268-3
  27. Iqbal, J., Khan, M., & Minhas, N. M. (2018). Are project managers informally following capability maturity model integration practices for project management? Global Journal of Information Technology: Emerging Technologies, 8(3), 86–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.18844/gjit.v8i3.4048
  28. Järveläinen, J. (2020). Understanding the stakeholder roles in business continuity management practices–a study in public sector. In Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, Manoa. doi:https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2020.241
  29. Jitpaiboon, T., & Kalaian, S. A. (2005). Analyzing the effect of top management support on Information System (IS) performance across organizations and industries using hierarchical linear modeling. Journal of International Information Management, 14(2), 131-144.
  30. Kerzner, H. (2009). Project management 10th ed+ student workbook+ case studies. New York, NY: John Wiley.
  31. Khan, S. U. R., Long, C. S., & Iqbal, S. M. J. (2014). Top management support, a potential moderator between project leadership and project success: A theoretical framework. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 8(11), 1373–1376. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100569
  32. Kljucnikov, A., Mura, L., & Sklenár, D. (2019). Information security management in SMEs: factors of success. ˇEntrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(4), 2081-2094. doi:http://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.6.4(37)
  33. Košt’álová, J., & Tetˇrevová, L. (2018). Proposal and verification of project management methods and tools oriented maturity model. Revista de Gestão e Projetos, 9(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.5585/gep.v9i1.595
  34. Král’, P., & Janošková, K. (2015). Condition of acceptability of project risk in management of the project portfolio. Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences, 7, 345-352.
  35. Kwofie, E. T. (2015). Contribution of unique features of mass housing projects to project team communication performance. Phd thesis, University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
  36. Lawani, A., & Moore, D. (2016). Project management practices in government organizations of developing countries: A systematic review. International Journal of Business & Management, 4(9), 89–98.
  37. Liu, J., Liu, Y., & Yang, L. (2020). Uncovering the influence mechanism between top management support and green procurement: The effect of green training. Journal of Cleaner Production, 251, 1-12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119674
  38. Liu, J., Love, P. E., Smith, J., Regan, M., & Davis, P. R. (2015). Life cycle critical success factors for public-private partnership infrastructure projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 31(5), 04014073.
  39. Longman, . M. J., A. (2005). The rational project manager: A thinking team’s guide to getting work done. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  40. Martins, A. C. B. (2013). Understanding the internet banking adoption by portuguese customers-a unified theory of acceptance and use of technology and perceived risk application. (PhD dissertation). Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
  41. Matt, D. T., Modrák, V., & Zsifkovits, H. (2020). Industry 4.0 for SMEs: Challenges, opportunities and requirements. The Hague, Netherlands: Springer Nature. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25425-4
  42. Maylor, H., Brady, T., Cooke-Davies, T., & Hodgson, D. (2006). From projectification to programmification. International Journal of Project Management, 24(8), 663–674. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.09.014
  43. Mellon, C. (2016). Cmmi brief history. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3kBaKCy
  44. Mettler, T. (2011). Maturity assessment models: A design science research approach. International Journal of Society Systems Science, 3(1-2), 81–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSS.2011.038934
  45. Mochal, T. (2002). Are project management skills valuable? Tech Republic, 1-2. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-0820-4_1
  46. Muriithi, N., & Crawford, L. (2003). Approaches to project management in Africa: Implications for international development projects. International Journal of Project Management, 21(5), 309–319. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00048-0
  47. Ng, S. T., Wong, Y. M., & Wong, J. M. (2012). Factors influencing the success of PPP at feasibility stage–A tripartite comparison study in Hong Kong. Habitat International, 36(4), 423–432. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.02.002
  48. Nguyen, H., & Nguyen, A. (2020). Determinants of accounting information systems quality: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. Accounting, 6(2), 185–198. doi:https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2019.10.004
  49. Nishant, R., Srivastava, S. C., & Bahli, B. (2020). Does virtualization capability maturity influence information systems development performance? Theorizing the non-linear payoffs. In Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, Manoa. doi:https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2020.677
  50. Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  51. Odwazny, F., Wojtkowiak, D., Cyplik, P., & Adamczak, M. (2019). Concept for measuring organizational maturity ̇supporting sustainable development goals. Log Forum, 15(2), 237-247. doi:https://doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2019.321
  52. Ofori, D., & Deffor, E. W. (2013). Assessing project management maturity in Africa: A Ghanaian perspective. International Journal of Business Administration, 4(6), 41. doi:https://doi.org/10.5430/ijba.v4n6p41
  53. Osei-Kyei, R., & Chan, A. P. (2015). Review of studies on the critical success factors for Public-Private Partnership (PPP) projects from 1990 to 2013. International Journal of Project Management, 33(6), 1335–1346. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.02.008
  54. Owusu, A. (2017). Business intelligence systems and bank performance in Ghana: The balanced scorecard approach. Cogent Business & Management, 4(1), 1364056.
  55. Owusu, A. (2019). Examining the moderating effects of time-since-adoption on the nexus between business intelligence systems and organisational performance: The Ghanaian banks perspectives. International Journal of Technology Diffusion (IJTD), 10(3), 49–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.4018/IJTD.2019070104
  56. Owusu, A., Agbemabiasie, G. C., Abdurrahaman, D. T., & Soladoye, B. A. (2017). Determinants of business intelligence systems adoption in developing countries: An empirical analysis from Ghanaian banks. The Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 1–25.
  57. Owusu, A., & Broni Jr, F. E. (2020). Strategic Information Systems Planning (SISP) implementation and use in a developing economy: The case of Ghanaian organizations. In Handbook of research on managing information systems in developing economies (pp. 1–27). Pennsylvania, PA: IGI Global. doi:https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2610-1.ch001
  58. Owusu, A., Ghanbari-Baghestan, A., & Kalantari, A. (2017). Investigating the factors affecting business intelligence systems adoption: A case study of private universities in Malaysia. International Journal of Technology Diffusion (IJTD), 8(2), 1–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.4018/IJTD.2017040101
  59. Owusu, E. K., Chan, A. P., DeGraft, O.-M., Ameyaw, E. E., & Robert, O.-K. (2019). Contemporary review of anti-corruption measures in construction project management. Project Management Journal, 50(1), 40–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972818808983
  60. Pastolero, P., Suss, A., & Hammerschlag, M. (2019). P395 acceptability of point of care testing for chlamydia trachomatis in adolescents: If we make it, will they take it? London, UK: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
  61. Paulk, M. C. (2009). A history of the capability maturity model for software. ASQ Software Quality Professional, 12(1), 5–19.
  62. Project Management Institute. (2000). A guide to the project management body of knowledge. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
  63. Radujkovic, M., & Sjekavica, M. (2017). Project management success factors. ́ Procedia Engineering, 196, 607–615. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.048
  64. Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2015). Smartpls 3. Retrieved from http://www.smartpls.com
  65. Rockart, J. F. (1982). Current uses of the critical success factors process. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Conference of the Society for Information Management, Chicago, IL.
  66. Schade, J., Schlag, B., et al. (2000). Acceptability of urban transport pricing. Finland: Valtion Taloudellinen Tutkimuskeskus Helsinki.
  67. Schlag, B., & Schade, J. (2000). Public acceptability of traffic demand management in Europe. Traffic Engineering+Control, 41(8), 314–18.
  68. Seelhofer, D., & Graf, C. O. (2018). National project management maturity: A conceptual framework. Central European Business Review, 7(2), 1. doi:https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.196
  69. Selmoune, A., Cheng, Q., Wang, L., & Liu, Z. (2020). Influencing factors in congestion pricing acceptability: A literature review. Journal of Advanced Transportation, (Just Accepted). doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4242964
  70. Shaikh, Z. A., Wagan, A. A., Laghari, A. A., Ali, K., Memon, M. A., & Sathio, A. A. (2019). The role of software configuration management and capability maturity model in system quality. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 19(11), 114-119.
  71. Spruit, M., & Pietzka, K. (2015). Md3m: The master data management maturity model. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 1068–1076. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.030
  72. Stone, M. (1974). Cross-validation and multinomial prediction. Biometrika, 61(3), 509–515. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/61.3.509
  73. Taiwo, A. A., & Downe, A. G. (2013). The theory of User Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): A meta-analytic review of empirical findings. Journal of Theoretical & Applied Information Technology, 49(1), 48-58.
  74. Takim, R., Abdul-Rahman, R., Ismail, K., & Egbu, C. (2008). The acceptability of Private Finance Initiative (PFI) scheme in Malaysia. Asian Social Science, 4(12), 71–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v4n12p71
  75. Tang, L., & Shen, Q. (2013). Factors affecting effectiveness and efficiency of analyzing stakeholders’ needs at the briefing stage of public private partnership projects. International Journal of Project Management, 31(4), 513–521. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.10.010
  76. The Open Group. (2017). Open Information Security Management Maturity Model (O-ISM3). Retrieved from https://www.ism3.com/
  77. Thornhill, A., Saunders, M., & Lewis, P. (2009). Research methods for business students. Essex: Pearson Education Ltd.
  78. Watts, S. (2018). CMMI: An introduction to capability maturity model integration – BMC blogs. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2ZVJvuz
  79. Weaver, P. (2007). The origins of modern project management. In Fourth Annual PMI College of Scheduling Conference, Vancouver, Canada.
  80. Wijethilake, C., & Lama, T. (2019). Sustainability core values and sustainability risk management: Moderating effects of top management commitment and stakeholder pressure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 143-154. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2245
  81. Wong, K. K. K. (2013). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques using SmartPLS. Marketing Bulletin, 24(1), 1-32.
  82. Yalegama, S., Chileshe, N., & Ma, T. (2016). Critical success factors for community-driven development projects: A Sri Lankan community perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 34(4), 643-659. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.02.006
  83. Yang, J. (2010). A framework for stakeholder management in construction projects (Doctoral dissertation). The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
  84. Young, R., & Jordan, E. (2008). Top management support: Mantra or necessity? International Journal of Project Management, 26(7), 713-725. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.06.001
  85. Young, R., & Poon, S. (2013). Top management support-almost always necessary and sometimes sufficient for success: Findings from a fuzzy set analysis. International Journal of Project Management, 31(7), 943-957. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.11.013

To Cite this article

Taana, I. H., & Raju, V. (2020). Preliminary investigations into the factors affecting successful implementation of project management frameworks and its effects on project success: Evidence from Ghana. International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, 6(5), 247-264. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.20469/ijbas.6.10003-5



© 2020. KKG Publications
Calle Alarcon 66, Sant Adrian De Besos 08930, Barcelona Spain | 00 34 610 911 348
About Us | Contact Us | Feedback

Search