KKG PUBLICATIONS
  • Home
  • Journals
    • BUSINESS & ADMINISTRATIVE STUDIES
    • HUMANITIES, ARTS & SOCIAL SCIENCES
    • TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING STUDIES
    • APPLIED SCIENCES
    • MEDICAL SCIENCES
  • Publishing Ethics
  • Privacy Policy
  • Crossmark Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Journals
    • BUSINESS & ADMINISTRATIVE STUDIES
    • HUMANITIES, ARTS & SOCIAL SCIENCES
    • TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING STUDIES
    • APPLIED SCIENCES
    • MEDICAL SCIENCES
  • Publishing Ethics
  • Privacy Policy
  • Crossmark Policy
  • Contact Us
  • https://evolua.ispcaala.com/
  • https://portal-indonesia.id/
  • https://sipena.rsjrw.id/
  • https://www.ijecom.org/
  • https://askimahciwimandiri.co.id/
  • http://lapassumbawa.com/
  • https://ijecom.org
  • https://spartan.mizoram.gov.in/
  • https://ejournal.neurona.web.id/
  • https://e-journal.staibta.ac.id/
  • http://ilim.not.kg/
  • http://journals.ieu.kiev.ua/
  • https://ojs.uhnsugriwa.ac.id/
  • https://jurnal.jalaberkat.com/
  • https://siami.uki.ac.id/
  • https://amr.lgu.edu.pk/

The Mediating Effect of Risk Management Strategies on the Relationship Between Attitude Constructs and Sustainability of Banana Production in Southern Philippines



Volume 4, Issue 2
Edren M. Panti, Gloria P. Gempes

Published online: 13 April 2018
Article Views: 23

Abstract

This study determined the mediating effect of risk management practices on the relationship between the attitude of farmers and sustainability of banana production in Southern Philippines, particularly on direct provincial players, including Davao Region, Bukidnon, Digos, North Cotabato, and ARMM area. The research design used in this study was the descriptive correlation that involved 400 banana growers as respondents. The purposive random sampling technique was done in selecting the respondents. Sets of adapted survey questionnaires were used to obtain data from the respondents subjected to content validity and reliability analysis. The data were analyzed using the Mean, Pearson-r, Multiple Regression Analysis, and Medgraph using Sobel z-test. The results revealed that the levels of attitude constructs, sustainable production, and risk-management strategies of banana growers are evident most of the time. Moreover, a significant relationship existed between these variables. A significant partial mediation of risk-management strategies in the relationship between attitude and sustainable production of farmers in Southern Mindanao was proven in the study. Moreover, the study results may contribute to a more comprehensive problem structuring and theory development in confronting the issues in sustainable agriculture.

References

  1. Afzal, A., Al-Subaiee, F. S., & Mirza, A. A. (2016). The attitudes of agricultural extension workers towards the use of e-extension for ensuring sustainability in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 8(10), 980-990. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su8100980
  2. Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 27–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.27
  3. Akcaoz, H., Ozcatalbas, O., & Kizilay, H. (2009). Analysis of energy use for pomegranate production in Turkey. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment, 7, 475–480.
  4. Allen, P., Van Dusen, D., Lundy, J., & Gliessman, S. (1991). Integrating social, environmental, and economic issues in sustainable agriculture. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 6(1), 34–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/s0889189300003787
  5. Almadani, M. I. N. (2014). Risk attitude, risk perceptions and risk management strategies: An empirical analysis of syrian wheat-cotton and pistachio farmers (Doctoral dissertation). Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
  6. Bagheri, A., Fami, H. S., Rezvanfar, A., Asadi, A., & Yazdani, S. (2008). Perceptions of paddy farmers towards sustainable agricultural technologies: Case of Haraz catchments area in Mazandaran province of Iran. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 5(10), 1384–1391. doi:https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2008.1384.1391
  7. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173.doi:https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173
  8. Blazy, J.-M., Carpentier, A., & Thomas, A. (2011). The willingness to adopt agro-ecological innovations: Application of choice modelling to caribbean banana planters. Ecological Economics, 72, 140–150. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.021
  9. Breitschuh, G. (2003). Indicator system for individual farm analysis and assessment of the sustainability of agricultural enterprises. In M. Girnau (Ed.), Sustainable agriculture and food industry: Challenges and opportunities in the value chain (p. 79-90). Berlin, Germany: E. Schmidt.
  10. Falconer, K. (2000). Farm-level constraints on agri-environmental scheme participation: A transactional perspective. Journal of Rural Studies, 16(3), 379–394. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0743-0167(99)00066-2
  11. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  12. Fufa, B., & Hassan, R. M. (2003). Stochastic maize production technology and production risk analysis in Dadar district, East Ethiopia. Agrekon, 42(2), 116–128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.2003.9523615
  13. Grieller, E. ., & Littig, B. (2004). Social sustainability. Vienna, Austria: Chamber of Labor Vienna.
  14. Jose, P. (2003). MedGraph-I: A programme to graphically depict mediation among three variables: The internet version, version 2.0. Wellington, New Zealand: Victoria Univesity of Wellington.
  15. Karami, E., & Mansoorabadi, A. (2008). Sustainable agricultural attitudes and behaviors: A gender analysis of Iranian farmers. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 10(6), 883–898. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-007-9090-7
  16. Liaghati, H., Veisi, H., Hematyar, H., & Ahmadzadeh, F. (2008). Assessing the students attitudes towards sustainable agriculture. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, 3(2), 227–232.
  17. Manayan, F. E. L. (2017). Comparative review of ASEAN member-countries labor productivity in the context of innovation (Doctoral dissertation). University of Southeastern Philippines, Davao City, Philippines.
  18. Murugi Kahangi, E. (2008). The potential of tissue culture banana (Musa spp.) technology in Africa and the anticipated limitations and constraints. Acta Hortic, 879, 281–288. doi:https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2010.879.28
  19. Pasha Sharifi, H. (2005). Preliminary study on gardner’s theory of multiple intelligences in the classroom and compatibility issues on students. Journal of Educational Innovations, 4(11), 11–34.
  20. Quijano, R. F. (2006). Health and the environment: The intimate connection. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2NGQNNQ
  21. Rasiah, V., Armour, J., Moody, P., Pattison, A., Lindsay, S., & Florentine, S. (2009). Characterising and improving the deteriorating trends in soil physical quality under banana. Soil Research, 47(6), 574–584. doi:https://doi.org/10.1071/sr08256
  22. Rigby, D., & Cáceres, D. (2001). Organic farming and the sustainability of agricultural systems. Agricultural Systems, 68(1), 21–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0308-521x(00)00060-3
  23. Sharfman, M. P., & Fernando, C. S. (2008). Environmental risk management and the cost of capital. Strategic Management Journal, 29(6), 569–592.
  24. Sheth, J. N., Sethia, N. K., & Srinivas, S. (2011). Mindful consumption: A customer-centric approach to sustainability. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 21–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0216-3
  25. Shuttleworth, M. (2008). Qualitative research design: Proving cause and effect. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2KZm6Di
  26. Solazzo, R., Donati, M., Arfini, F., & Petriccione, G. (2014). A PMP model for the impact assessment of the Common Agricultural Policy reform 2014-2020 on the Italian tomato sector. New Medit, A Mediterranean Journal of Economics, Agriculture and Environment, 13(2), 9–19.
  27. Spangenberg, J. H. (2002). Institutional sustainability indicators: An analysis of the institutions in agenda 21 and a draft set of indicators for monitoring their effectivity. Sustainable Development, 10(2), 103–115. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.184
  28. Tabien, C., Rola, A. C., Carada, W., & Devibar, E. (2001). Linking research and local governance in environmental management: the experience in Lantapan, Bukidnon, Philippines. In Sustaining Upland Development in Southeast Asia: Issues, Tools, and Institutions for Local Natural Resources Management Conference ACCEED, Makati City, Philippines.
  29. Teng, F., Quoquab, F., Hussin, N., & Mohammad, J. (2016). Re-defining sustainable development values and its facets based on developing country perspective. Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(2), 1-13. doi:https://doi.org/10.20474/jahss2.1.1
  30. United Nations. (2001). Commission on sustainable development: Report on the ninth session (Tech. Rep.). New York, NY: United Nations Economic and Social Council.
  31. Weinberg, J. (2008). An NGO guide to persistent organic pollutants- A framework for action to protect human health and the environment from persistent organic pollutants (POPs) (Tech. Rep.). Sweden: International POPs Elimination Network IPEN.
  32. Wheeler, S. (2005). Factors influencing agricultural professionals’ attitudes towards organic agriculture and biotechnology (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). School of Commerce, University of South Australia, Mount Gambier, Australia.
  33. World Bank. (2005). Managing agricultural production risk: Innovations in developing countries (Tech. Rep.). Washington, DC, WA: World Bank.
  34. Wu, P. J. (2016). Logistics business analytics for achieving environmental sustainability. Journal of Administrative and Business Studies, 2(6), 264-269. doi:https://doi.org/10.20474/jabs-2.6.1
  35. Zahm, F., Viaux, P., Vilain, L., Girardin, P., & Mouchet, C. (2008). Assessing farm sustainability with the idea method–from the concept of agriculture sustainability to case studies on farms. Sustainable Development, 16(4), 271–281. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.380

To Cite this article

Panti, E., Gempes, M., & Gloria, P. (2018). The mediating effect of risk management strategies on the relationship between attitude constructs and sustainability of banana production in Southern Philippines. International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, 4(2), 68-77. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.20469/ijbas.4.10004-2



© 2020. KKG Publications
Calle Alarcon 66, Sant Adrian De Besos 08930, Barcelona Spain | 00 34 610 911 348
About Us | Contact Us | Feedback

Search