The use of flipped classroom as a new teaching mode has proliferated nowadays. This paper is aimed to discuss how to develop students ability to work on a writing project by means of a flipped classroom. The discussion addresses several issues related to flipped classroom, project based-learning, digital technology use and developing writing project. By integrating project in a flipped classroom which harnesses digital technologies such as the use of video and internet, it is expected that learners could be well-equipped with how to do a writing project. The inclusion of project issue has been to show that teaching should promote less teaching and more learning.

1. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Bloom, B. S. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New Jersey, NJ: Pearson Education.
   
2. Atherton J. S. (2011). Learning and Teaching; Constructivism in learning. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/CZakDU
   
3. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
   
4. Berrett, D. (2012). How ’flipping’ the classroom can improve the traditional lecture. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 58(21), 16-18.
   
5. Bloom, B. S. (1978). New views of the learner: Implications for instruction and curriculum. Educational Leadership, 35(7), 563-576.
   
6. Bonk, C.J., (2009). The world is open: How web technology is revolutionizing education. San Francisco, CA: Wiley Publishing.
   
7. Boss, S., & Krauss, J. (2007). Reinventing project-based learning: Your field guide to real-world projects in the digital age. Eugene, Oregon, Washington DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
   
8. Bowen, J. A. (2006). Teaching naked: Why removing technology from your classroom will improve student learning. The National Teaching & Learning Forum, 16(1), 1-5.
   
9. Brame, C. (2013). Flipping the classroom. Vanderbilt university center for teaching. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/upXkH6
   
10. Brandt, D. S. (1997). Constructivism: Teaching for understanding of the Internet. Communications of the ACM, 40(10), 112-117. https://doi.org/10.1145/262793.262814
    
11. Dean, J. (2010). Smartphone user survey: A glimpse into the mobile lives of college students. Boulder, Colorado: University of Colorado Boulder.
    
12. Franciszkowicz, M. (2008). Video-based instruction to enhance an active learning environment for general chemistry. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology, 4(2), 5-14.
    
13. Gaer, S. (1998). Less teaching and more learning. Boston, MA: NCSALL/World Education. PMid:9880953
    
14. Kavaliauskiene, (2003). Two activities for fostering autonomous learning. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/RzXBek
    
15. Kim, K. J., & Bonk, C. J. (2006). The future of online teaching and learning in higher education. Education Cause Quarterly, 29(4), 22-30.
    
16. Kloppenborg, T. J., & Baucus, M. S. (2004). Project management in local nonprofit organizations: Engaging students in problembased learning. Journal of Management Education, 28(5), 610-629. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562904266008
    
17. Kongmanus, K. (2016). Development of project-based learning model to enhance educational media business ability for undergraduate students in educational technology and communications program. Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(5), 287-296.
18. McLeod, S. A. (2010). Simply psychology: Zone of proximal development. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/j3y1Nc
    
19. Moss, D., & Van Duzer, C. (1998). Project-based learning for adult English learners: Eric. Digest. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/8SiB0q
    
20. Niess, M. L., Ronau, R. N., Shafer, K. G., Driskell, S. O., Harper S. R., Johnston, C., Browning, C., Ozgun-Koca, S. A., & Kersaint, G. (2009). Mathematics teacher TPACK standards and development model. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 4-24.
    
21. Overmyer, G. R. (2007). The flipped classroom model for college algebra: Effects on student achievement (Doctoral dissertation). Colorado, CO: Colorado State University.
    
22. Peterson, P. E., & Horn, M. B. (2016). The ideal blended-learning combination: is one-third computer time about right? Education Next, 16(2), 94-96.
    
23. Piaget, J. (1968). On the development of memory and identity. Massachusetts, MA: Clark University Press with Barre Publishers.
    
24. Revere, L., & Kovach, J. V. (2011). Online technologies for engaging learners: A meaningful synthesis for educators. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 12(2), 113-124.
    
25. Simpson, J. (2011). Integrating project-based learning in an English language tourism classroom in a Thai university institution (Doctoral dissertation, Doctoral thesis). Sydney, Australia: Australian Catholic University.
    
26. Solomon, G. (2003). Project-based learning: A primer. Technology & Learning, 23(6), 20-20.
    
27. Srikrai, P. (2008). Project-based Learning in an EFL classroom. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, Khon Kean University, 25, 85-111.
    
28. Stoller, L. S. (1997). Project work: A means to promote language content. Forum, 35(4), 2-18.
    
29. Supratman, L. P. (2015). A case study of classroom seating arrangement to promote students communication and interactivity in Telkom University. International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 1(3), 130-133.
30. Topping, K., & Ehly, S. (1998). Peer-assisted learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
    
31. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Massachusetts, MA: Harvard University Press.
    
32. Willie, S. L. (2001). Project based learning with multimedia. Redwood, CA: San Mateo County Office of Education.

Nurnia, Kamaluddin, Milwan, & Herman, (2017). Developing students’ writing project by means of a flipped classroom. International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, 3(1), 15-20.