Kaizen event is about implementing structured continuous improvement projects, using a dedicated cross-functional team to improve a targeted work area, process or product. Usually, it is executed within an accelerated timeframe by applying proven process tools and human creativity to improve the overall performance. Thus, this paper shows the enhancement a company has experienced with the implementation of kaizen events in one of its production areas. The main aim is to share how assessment methodologies were systematically conducted on the areas that should be empirically measured and evaluated to maximize the impact of kaizen events on the overall performance. All the measurements, techniques, and methods were described clearly, thus underlining its potential benefits and pitfalls. The case proposed refers to a manufacturing components company for the automotive industry in Malaysia. This case study evaluates one particular event of many events done by the company every day. Through performance analysis, results were measured and analyzed by comparing the lean metrics such as productivity, quality, space, cycle time, and setup time reduction between the existing against the improved area. Findings show that the company managed to reduce its operational cost and production lead time significantly. As for the cost saving analysis assessment, a total of RM 31,661.22 per year of saving is targeted to be achieved through the long-term commitment from the kaizen team and top management. On the other hand, the economic analysis shows that the investment made for this event is viable and less risky to be implemented in other production areas or other manufacturing disciplines.

1. Flynn, B. B., & Flynn, E. J. (2004). An exploratory study of the nature of cumulative capabilities. Journal of Operations Management, 22(5), 439-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.03.002
   
2. Ho, J. K. L., Chu, K. F., & Mok, C. K. (2005). Minimizing manufacturing costs for thin injection molded plastic components. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 26(5-6), 517-526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-2023-1
   
3. Jung, J. Y. (2002). Manufacturing cost estimation for machined parts based on manufacturing features. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 13(4), 227-238. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016092808320
   
4. Myint, L. L. (2007). Process analysis and optimization of biodiesel production from vegetable oils (Doctoral dissertation). Texas A&M University, Texas, TX.
   
5. Pavlovcic, L., Krajnc, A., & Berg, D. (2004). Cost function analysis in the structural optimization of steel frames. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 28(4), 286-295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0430-z
   
6. Phyoe, E. E. (2015). The Relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth of selected ASEAN Countries. International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, 1(4), 132-146.
   
7. Sahoo, A. K., Singh, N. K., Shankar, R., & Tiwari, M. K. (2008). Lean philosophy: Implementation in a forging company. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 36(5-6), 451-462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0870-2
   
8. Sakamoto, S. (2010). Definition of productivity/requirements for improving it. In beyond world-class productivity (pp. 49-64). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-269-8   PMid:20118624
   
9. Smalley, A. (2004). Creating level pull: A lean production-system improvement guide for production-control, operations and engineering professionals. Massachusetts, MA: Lean Enterprise Institute.

Halim, N. H. A., Adnan, A. N., & Khusaini, N. S. (2017). Kaizen event assessment through performance and economic investment analysis. International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, 3(1), 1-7.