Being one of four major industries involved in the development of the free trade port in Hainanvigorously developing high-tech enterprises is an inevitable choice for Hainan to realize its innovation-driven development strategy and to catch up from being a latecomer to realizing the curved-track overtaking. In this process, innovation policy and digital transformation will play a pivotal role in the development of high-tech enterprises and affect their innovation performance. Considering this, this work firstly emphasizes the importance of innovation policy and digital transformation on the innovation performance and development of high-tech enterprises in Hainan; secondly puts forward the three research objectives of this paper; then discusses the research methodology from the research design, the research sample, the sample size, the sampling method and the questionnaire design; finally, the study concludes that the innovation policy and the digital transformation have a positive impact on the innovation performance, and that the digital transformation plays a mediating role in the innovation performance. innovation policy and innovation performance play a mediating role, so as to provide a reference for the government to promote the development of high-tech enterprises.
Abula, K., Abula, B., Wang, X., & Wang, D. (2022). Performance evaluations and influencing factors of the agricultural product trade supply chain between china and central asian countries. Sustainability, 14(23), 15622.
Akter, S., Wamba, S. F., Gunasekaran, A., Dubey, R., & Childe, S. J. (2016). How to improve firm performance using big data analytics capability and business strategy alignment? International journal of production economics, 182, 113-131.
Cheng, Q., & Wang, S. (2022). Research on the impact of innovation output on ipo underpricing rate based on multiple linear regression model.
Cin, B. C., Kim, Y. J., & Vonortas, N. S. (2017). The impact of public r&d subsidy on small firm productivity: evidence from korean smes. Small Business Economics, 48, 345-360.
Creswell, J. W. (2021). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE publications.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
Hanaysha, J., & Abdullah, H. H. (2015). The impact of product innovation on relationship quality in automotive industry: Strategic focus on brand satisfaction, brand trust, and brand commitment. Asian Social Science, 11(10), 94-104.
Howell, A. (2016). Firm r&d, innovation and easing financial constraints in china: Does corporate tax reform matter? Research Policy, 45(10), 1996-2007.
Hu, P., Hao, Y., & Wang, G. (2022). How does capability reconfiguration impact the innovation performance of chinese manufacturing firms? Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 966653.
Ito, A., Li, Z., & Wang, M. (2017). Multi-level and multi-route innovation policies in china: A programme evaluation based on firm-level data. Millennial Asia, 8(1), 78-107.
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in pls-sem: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration (ijec), 11(4), 1-10.
Lin, W., Xing, S., Jin, Y., Lu, X., Huang, C., & Yong, Q. (2020). Insight into understanding the performance of deep eutectic solvent pretreatment on improving enzymatic digestibility of bamboo residues. Bioresource Technology, 306, 123163.
Mudambi, R., Mudambi, S. M., Mukherjee, D., & Scalera, V. G. (2017). Global connectivity and the evolution of industrial clusters: From tires to polymers in northeast ohio. Industrial marketing management, 61, 20-29.
Nwankpa, J. K., & Roumani, Y. (2016). It capability and digital transformation: A firm performance perspective.
Peng, W., Yin, Y., Wen, Z., & Kuang, J. (2021). Spatial spillover effect of green innovation on economic development quality in china: Evidence from a panel data of 270 prefecture-level and above cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 69, 102863.
Singh, A. S., & Masuku, M. B. (2014). Sampling techniques & determination of sample size in applied statistics research: An overview. International Journal of economics, commerce and management, 2(11), 1-22.
Vial, G. (2021). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Managing digital transformation, 13-66.
Werts, C. E., Linn, R. L., & Jöreskog, K. G. (1974). Intraclass reliability estimates: Testing structural assumptions. Educational and Psychological measurement, 34(1), 25-33.
Xu, J., & Li, W. (2023). Study on the impact of digital economy on innovation output based on dynamic panel data model. European Journal of Innovation Management.
Zhang, J., & Long, J. (2022). Digital transformation, dynamic capability, and enterprise innovation performance: Empirical evidence from high—tech listed companies. J]. Economics and Management, 36(03), 74-83.
Zhang, L., Xiong, K., Gao, X., & Yang, Y. (2022). Factors influencing innovation performance of china’s high-end manufacturing clusters: Dual-perspective from the digital economy and the innovation networks. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1012228.
Zhou, J., Li, J., Liu, Z., & Li, Z. (2017). Influence mechanism of government’s innovation policies on firm’s innovation performance. J. Technol. Econ, 38, 57-65.
A. Zielinski, H. Nakajima, C. DeShazo-Couchot, G. Beasley, R. Shinde , J. Jiang, S. Makhsous and A. Mamishev “Gamification of Research Experience in a Large Academic Laboratory,” International Journal of Applied and Physical Sciences, vol. 10, pp. 31-37, 2024. Doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.20469/ijaps.10.50004
