This research aimed to synthesize the framework of learning innovation framework to enhance knowledge construction and scientific thinking for students in basic education. The research designs of this study were document analysis and survey. The target group was the three experts reviewed document, theoretical and design framework. The data were collected by qualitative method and analyzed using summary interpreting. The results show that: the synthesis of learning innovation framework to enrich knowledge construction and scientific thinking for pupils in basic education was the theoretical framework consist of three foundation bases as the following; (1) context base, (2) psychological and pedagogies base, and (3) technological and media theory base. The designing framework consisted of four foundation bases as the following; (1) to activate the cognitive structure innovation, enhancement knowledge construction, and scientific thinking; (2) to support an adjustment of conflict cognitive innovation and enhance knowledge construction and scientific thinking; (3) to provide the cognitive structure and innovation to enhance knowledge construction and scientific thinking; and (4) to assist the enlargement knowledge construction and scientific thinking. The foundation bases consist of seven essential elements: this framework was reviewed and evaluated by experts who assume that effective and implementable knowledge construction and scientific thinking.

1. 1. National Education Act (1999). Education, vocational guidance and training, Thailand [Online]. Available: https://goo.gl/18j41R
   2. Labour Protection Act (no. 4). (2010). Occupational safety and health [Online]. Available: https://goo.gl/8ZbV1B
      
   3. H. Alghamdi and L. Sun, “Business and IT alignment in higher education sector,” International Journal of Technology and Engineering Studies, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 01-08, 2017.
      
   4. T. S. Kuhn, The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
      
   5. H. Alghamdi and L. Sun, “Business and IT alignment in higher education sector,” International Journal of Technology and Engineering Studies, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 01-08, 2017.
      
   6. S. Saowakon and C. Sumalee, “Development of rich chemistry multimedia learning environment models to foster scientific thinking,” European Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 410-412, 2012.
      
   7. Z. A. Mohideen, K. Kaur, S. Muhamad, N. A. W. Jan and A. B. Ahamadhu, “ITIL: Implementation and service management best practices in Malaysian academic libraries,” International Journal of Technology and Engineering Studies, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 65-73, 2017.
      
   8. The Basic Education Core Curriculum. (2008). Science learning areas [Online]. Available: https://goo.gl/2cTKdP
      
   9. R. N. Tarmuchi, H. Mohamed and A. S. Ismail, A“ synchronous learning tools use in graduate study: A preliminary survey,” International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 13-18, 2015.
      
   10. R. E. Mayer, “Learning strategies for making sense out of expository text: The SOI model for guiding three cognitive processes in knowledge construction,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 357-371, 1996.
       
   11. A. Collins, J. S. Brown and A. Holum, “Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible,” Journal of the American Federation of Teachers, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 6-11, 1991.
       
   12. J. Piaget, The moral judgment of the child. New York, NY: Free Press, 1965.
       
   13. L. S. Vygotsky, The psychology of art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1971.
       
   14. R. D. Hannafin, “Achievement differences in structured versus unstructured instructional geometry programs,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 19-32, 2004.
       
   15. D. H. Jonassen, “Thinking technology: Towards a constructivist design model,” Educational Technology, vol. 34, no. 4, 34-37, 1994.
       
   16. D. Kuhn, “What is scientific thinking and how does it develop?” in Handbook of childhood cognitive development (Blackwell), U. Goswami, Ed. New York, NY: Teachers College Columbia University, 2010.
       
   17. L. S. Vygotsky, “Principles of social education for the deaf-mute child,” in The collected works of cognition and language (A Series in Psycholinguistics), R. W. Rieber and A. S. Carton Eds. Boston, MA: Springer, 1993.
       
   18. L. S. Vygotsky, Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1962.
       
   19. K. Parama, C. Sumalee, S. Charuni and K. Issara, “Framework for development of cognitive innovation to enhance knowledge construction and memory process,” Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 46, pp. 3409-3414, 2012.
       
   20. K. O. Nuttariya, C. Sumalee, K. Issara and S. Charuni, “Designing framework of multimedia learning environment to enhance problem solving transfer,” Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 46, pp. 3421-3425, 2012.
       
   21. G. Thitima and C. Sumalee, Scientific thinking of the learners learning with the knowledge construction model enhancing scientific thinking, Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 46, pp. 3771-3775, 2012.

J. Thisuwan, K. Prasittisa and P. Kwangmuang, “The framework of learning innovation to enhance knowledge construction and scientific thinking for students in basic education,” International Journal of Applied and Physical Sciences, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 68-74, 2017.