Volatility contagion has become a trend of financial crisis research ever since the outbreak of 2007 Sub-prime crisis in the US. Existing contagion studies are either too sector-based, or focus on specific financial product so there is a lack of comprehensive study to incorporate multiple indicators driving the volatility contagion. This study analysed multiple sources that can be associated with volatility contagion, comprising both the financial and non-financial sectors, market information, macroeconomic financial variables, country debt risks and external factors (S&P 500) combined together as variety types of indicators driving the volatility contagion. A generalised VAR-GARCH with multivariate BEKK-GARCH approach is employed to analyse volatility contagion of daily sectorial indices of six Asian countries from 1990 until 2015. When AIC criterion information was analysed, it showed that the VAR (1)-GARCH(1,1) model benchmark was robust. This covers two financial crises: Asian Financial Crisis (1997) and the Sub-prime Mortgage Crisis (2007). The research design is partitioned into three stages. The first stage is to analyse the structure of volatility contagion within the selected six Asia countries. In the start of financial crisis, strong interconnection exists between bank credit risk and sovereign credit risk. However, there is no literature providing empirical evidence of the country debt risk on volatility contagion. Hence, in the second stage, this study measures country risk with a Two-limit Tobit model to explore whether the volatility contagion is driven by country risk fluctuation. And lastly is to identify the fourteen major indicators from different sectors driving the volatility contagion, country risk is one of them. The results documented statistical evidence that the volatility contagion was not caused by a single factor. Rather, all volatility contagion has multiple indicators. Country debt risk is one of the important indicators driving volatility contagion. This is contrary to previous studies which focused only on specific sectors or products.

1. Agnolucci, P. (2009). Volatility in crude oil futures: A comparison of the predictive ability of GARCH and implied volatility models. Energy Economics, 31(2), 316-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2008.11.001
2. Amemiya, T. (1984). Tobit models: A survey. Journal of Econometrics, 24(1-2), 3-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(84)90074-5
3. Anderson M. (2011). Contagion and excess correlation in credit default swaps. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/PNTv4I https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1937998
4. Arouri, M. E. H., Jouini, J., & Nguyen, D. K. (2011). Volatility spillovers between oil prices and stock sector returns: Implications for portfolio management. Journal of International Money and Finance, 30(7), 1387-1405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2011.07.008
5. Bollerslev, T. (1990). Modelling the coherence in short-run nominal exchange rates: A multivariate generalized ARCH approach. Review of Economics and Statistics, 72(3), 498-505. https://doi.org/10.2307/2109358
6. Chang, M. C., Jiang, S. J., & Lu, K. Y. (2009). Lead-lag relationship between different crude oil markets: Evidence from Dubai and Brent. Middle Eastern Finance and Economics, 5, 1450-2889.
7. Engle, R. (2002). Dynamic conditional correlation: A simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20(3), 339-350. https://doi.org/10.1198/073500102288618487
8. Engle, R. F., & Kroner, K. F. (1995). Multivariate simultaneous generalized ARCH. Econometric Theory, 11(01), 122-150. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466600009063
9. Gur, T. H. (2001). A country risk assessment model and the Asian crisis. Central Bank Review, 1(1), 49-68.
10. Hassan, S. A., & Malik, F. (2007). Multivariate GARCH modeling of sector volatility transmission. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 47(3), 470-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2006.05.006
11. Haworth, H., Reisinger, C., & Shaw, W. (2008). Modelling bonds and credit default swaps using a structural model with contagion. Quantitative Finance, 8(7), 669-680. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697680701834614
12. Jorion, P., & Zhang, G. (2007). Good and bad credit contagion: Evidence from credit default swaps. Journal of Financial Economics, 84(3), 860-883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.06.001
13. Kang, S. H., Kang, S. M., & Yoon, S. M. (2009). Forecasting volatility of crude oil markets. Energy Economics, 31(1), 119-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2008.09.006
14. Lee, S. N., Cheng, F. F., Hooy, C. H., & Taufiq, H. C. (2016). Country risk assessment model for six Asia countries. Universiti Putra Malaysia, Seri Kembangan, Malaysia.
15. Ling, S., & McAleer, M. (2003). Asymptotic theory for a vector ARMA-GARCH model. Econometric Theory, 19(02), 280-310. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466603192092
16. Nishiyama, S. (2016). Equilibrium properties in the duopolistic price-setting market as determinants for the term structure of interest rates: A game-theoretic approach. Journal of Administrative and Business Studies, 2(4), 151-155.
17. Place, F. M. (1989). Information quality, country risk assessment, and private bank lending to less-developed countries (PhD. dissertation). University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, WI.
18. Rosett, R. N., & Nelson, F. D. (1975). Estimation of the two-limit probit regression model. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 43(1), 141-146. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913419
19. Tobin, J. (1958). Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 26(1), 24-36. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907382
20. World Bank. (2000). Global economic prospects and the developing countries. World Bank, Washington, WA.

Lee, S. N., Cheng, F. F., Hooy, C. W., & Yahya, M. H. D. H. (2017). Volatility contagion in selected six Asian countries: Evidence from country debt risk and determinant indicators. International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, 3(2), 36-55.