An Analysis of the Relationship between Foreign Trade and Economic Growth in Myanmar
during 1990-2014



Volume 1, Issue 4
KYAW KYAW LYNN

Published online: 5 December 2015
Article Views: 16

Abstract

This study examines the association between foreign trade and economic growth in Myanmar over the period 1990-2014. It covers the annual data of GDP, Export and Import of Myanmar from 1980 to 2014. This study adopts two major methodological approaches – exploratory data analysis and descriptive analysis. For the first approach, the Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) unit root test and Granger causality test are used under the Vector Autoregressive (VAR) model, which has rarely been studied for the Myanmar case. The second approach includes the analysis of Myanmar’s foreign trade trend with descriptive statistics. The results show that foreign trade did not generate a significant effect on the economic growth of Myanmar. Rather, import growth was negatively influenced by the economic growth of Myanmar. It is found out that the GDP growth had determined exports. Thus, a growth-driven export strategy had been applied between 1990 and 2014. Also, there was only one causal run from export growth to import growth. The results conclude that foreign trade did not significantly impact the economic growth of Myanmar over the period of 19902014.economic growth of Myanmar over the period of 1990–2014.

References

  1. Ahmed, I. (2006, September 25). Burma’s natural gas contributesto $1.3 billion trade surplus. Burma Net News. Retrieved from: https://goo.gl/WMjjcg
  2. Anonymous. (2014, December 13). International trade: A troubling trajectory. The Economists. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/nGF0Mi
  3. Anonymous. (2014, June, 20). Myanmar ranks 41 in natural gas reserves. The Nation. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/wj6rU9
  4. Asian Development Bank. (2013). Myanmar: Agriculture, natural resources, and environment initial sector assessment, strategy, and road map. Bangkok, Thailand.
  5. Badarudin, Z. E. (2009). Money supply endogeneity and bank stock returns: Empirical evidence from the G-7 countries (Doctoral dissertation). Bond University, Queensland, Australia.
  6. Chow, G. C. (2011). A model for national income determination in Taiwan (Working Papers No. 1335). Princeton University, US.
  7. Adesuyi, O. O., & Odeloye, O. D. (2013). Foreign trade and economic Growth in Nigeria (1980-2010). Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 4(13), 73-88.
  8. Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251-276. https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1913236
  9. Gökmen, A., & Temiz, D. (2010). An analysis of the export and economic growth in Turkey over the period of 1950-2009. International Journal of Economic and Administrative Studies, 3(5), 124-142.
  10. Granger, C. W. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438. https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1912791
  11. Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1990). Trade, innovation, and growth. The American Economic Review, 80(2), 86-91.
  12. Hlaing, T. M. (2014). A study on trade reforms in Myanmar (1948-2010) (Unpublished Draft). Yangon Institute of Economic, Myanmar.
  13. Hunter, B. (2014). The pros and cons of international trade. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/22Gw7U
  14. Johansen, S., & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration-with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), 169-210. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1990.mp52002003.x
  15. Kaewsompong, N., Sriboonchitta, S., Chaitip, P., & Pastpipatkul, P. (2012). Econometric modeling of the relationship among macroeconomic variables of Thailand: Smooth transition autoregressive regression model. The Empirical Econometrics and Quantitative Economics Letters, 1(4), 21-38.
  16. Kahya, M. (2011). An analysis of the relationship between foreign trade and economic growth in Turkey over the period 1980-2009 (Unpublished Draft). Lund University, Sweden. PMCid:PMC3297774
  17. Konya, L. (2004). Export-led growth, growth-driven export, both or none? Granger causality analysis on OECD countries. Applied Econometrics and International Development, 4(1), 73-94.
  18. Kónya, L., & Singh, J. P. (2006). Exports, imports and economic growth in India (Discussion Paper). La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria.
  19. Kudo, T. (2005). The impact of United States Sanctions on the Myanmar Garment Industry. Institute of Developing Economies, JETRO, Japan.
  20. Kudo, T., & Mieno, F. (2007). Trade, Foreign Investment and Myanmar’s Economic Development during the Transition to an Open Economy (Disscussion Paper Series). Institute of Developing Dconomies, JETRO, Japan.
  21. Li, Y., Chen, Z., & Wang, X. (2010). An Empirical Study on the contribution of foreign trade to the economic growth of Jiangxi province, China. iBusiness, 2, 183-187. https://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ib.2010.22022
  22. Lu, C., & Xin, Z. (2010). Impulse-response function Analysis: An application to macroeconomic data of China (MS thesis). School of Economics and Social Sciences, Dalarna University, Sweden.
  23. Lütkepohl, H. (1999). Vector autoregressive analysis (Discussion Papers No. 31). Interdisciplinary Research Project.
  24. Myat, A. M. (2014). An analysis on Myanmar’s border trade development with neighboring countries (1997-2012) (Master thesis). Yangon Institute of Economics, Myanmar.
  25. Naing, Z. Z. (2014). Trade policy reform in Myanmar (Unpublished Draft). Yangon University of Economics, Myanmar, available at: www.unescap.org
  26. Nguyen, H. T. (2011). Exports, imports, FDI and economic Growth (Discussion Papers No. 11-03).
  27. Nguyen, H. T. (2011). Exports, imports, FDI and economic growth. Discussion papers in economics. Working paper, (11-03), 1-47.
  28. Ozturk, I., & Acaravci, A. (2007). Testing the export-led growth hypothesis: Empirical evidence from Turkey.
  29. Ramos, F. F. R. (2001). Exports, imports, and economic growth in Portugal: Evidence from causality and cointegration analysis. Economic Modelling, 18(4), 613-623. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0264-9993(00)00055-9
  30. Shahid, N. (2013). Export-Led growth strategy: Tool for economic development in India. Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, 4(1), 1-7.
  31. Sims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica, 48(1), 1-48. https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1912017
  32. Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (1988). Testing for common trends. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1097-1107. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478707
  33. Temiz, D., & Gökmen, A. (2010). An analysis of the export and economic growth in Turkey over the period of 1950-2009. text here (5), 123-141.
  34. Than, T. M. M. (2007). Myanmar’s foreign trade under military rule: Patterns and recent trends. Southeast Asian Affairs, 242-254. https://dx.doi.org/10.1355/SEAA07L
  35. Usman, S., & Sarpong, F. A.-A. (2008). Testing Granger causality with application to Exchange rates for Swedish kronor with GB pound and US dollar (Master Thesis). Lund University, Sweden.
  36. Velnampy.T, & Achchuthan, S. (2013). Export, import and economic growth: Evidence from Sri Lanka. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 4(9), 147-156.
  37. Xu, Y. (2012). Demographic changes, household savings and economic growth in all china: A time-series approach (Master Thesis). Lund University, Sweden.

To Cite this article

Lynn, K. K. (2015). An analysis of the relationship between foreign trade and economic growth in Myanmar during 1990-2014? International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, 1(4), 114-131.