The ‘Thought Model’ of Spirituality to Solve Conflicts in Training and Education of Spiritual Health in Modern Public Healthcare Systems Volume 5 Published online: 08 March 2019
AbstractThe Spiritual Dimension was added to the definition of health after the historic resolution WHA37 in 1984 by WHO, making the Spiritual Dimension important for the strategies for health. Multiple scientific studies have clear evidence of the importance of the spiritual dimension in all public health and healthcare domains. The spiritual dimension of health is perceived directly in religious contexts, making it communal, complex, ambiguous, and ill-defined boundaries with religions make it a misfit for modern scientific healthcare systems. It resulted in a neglected approach in training and application by health professionals and policymakers, leading to poor research, education, and clinical use of spiritual health, which strongly influences individuals and communities’ organized efforts and choices in preventive, promotive, and curative health. To solve these problems in the training and education of healthcare professionals by decreasing the complexities and ambiguities in defining spirituality. We analyzed the human thought process in a life-threatening situation. Based on our observations, we proposed the ’Thought Model’ of spirituality to free it from the religious bounding with a scientific approach and make it less ambiguous for public health applications based on the evolution of human thought processes. In clinical settings of modern healthcare, this ’thought model’ of defining and understanding spirituality provides its scientific compatibility by decreasing the conflicting religious beliefs common in healthcare delivery systems to almost nil by navigating the conflicting religious, cultural, and scientific thoughts. Reference
To Cite this articleBhatt, M. “The ‘thought model’ of spirituality to solve conflicts in training and education of spiritual health in modern public healthcare systems,” International Journal of Health and Medical Sciences, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 29-34. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.20469/ijhms.5.30004-1 |