Introductory to Accounting is one of the compulsory courses to be enrolled by non-accounting students in most of higher learning institutions in Malaysia. In trying to increase their passing rate, students pre-conceive accounting to be difficult, unpleasant and unattainable has become a major challenge for accounting educators. This paper aims to examine non-accounting students’ perception towards introductory accounting course in Borneo Region, particularly in University of Malaysia Sabah (UMS). UMS is one of two public university in the Island of Borneo in Malaysia. The study focused mainly on aspects of program structure, assessment and external factor. In total, 409 non-accounting students involved in this study. Our preliminary finding suggests that, appropriateness of content in syllabus, load of assignment and the inclusion of both management and financial accounting into one course is perceived to be acceptable. Meanwhile, for the assessment factor, the clarity and level of difficulty to understand the final examination question, time allocated during final examination, assessment to be matched with the course outcome, final examination formats and marks allocated address no impacts against their perceived perceptions. External factors of financial, family, facilities and transportation problems revealed no importance in determining student’s perception of introductory accounting course. Students are generally still in favour with the assessment and program structure of introductory accounting course. At the same time, external factor has become insignificant in influencing their decision to perceived accounting course as acceptable or not in their learning environment.

1. Akenbor, C. O., & Ibanichuka, E. A. L. (2014). Institutional factors influencing the academic performance of students in principles of accounting. International Journal of Higher Education Management, 1(1), 15-26.
2. Almer, E. D., Jones, K., & Moeckel, C. L. (1998). The impact of one-minute papers on learning in an introductory accounting course. Issues in Accounting Education, 13(3), 485-497
3. Anbar, M. (1991). Comparing assessments of students’ knowledge by computerized open-ended and multiple-choice tests. Academic medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 66(7), 420–422.doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199107000-00012
4. Attuluri, S. (2019).Institutional changes in Mexico higher education: A reform to U.S accreditations. International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 5(1), 9-19. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.20469/ijhss.5.10002-1
5. Bobe, B. J., &Cooper, B. J. (2018). Accounting students’ perceptions of effective teaching and approaches to learning: Impact on overall student satisfaction. Accounting & Finance, 1-45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12364
6. Brink, A. G. (2013).The impact of pre-and post-lecture quizzes on performance in intermediate accounting II. Issues in Accounting Education, 28(3), 461–485. doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1904714
7. Cooper, D. R.,Schindler, P., & Sun, J. (2006). Business research methods. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
8. Des, J. M., & Vu, N. V.Developing and evaluating the student assessment system in the preclinical problem-based curriculum at sherbrooke. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges,71(3), 274–283.
9. de Sousa Costa, P., de Sousa Gomes, G., Rosa, N., & Batalhone, P. P. (2018). An analysis of student perceptions of
   introductory accounting classes. IJAME, 4(4), 39-56.
10. Elikai, F., & Baker, J. (1988). Empirical evidence on the effectiveness of quizzes as a motivational technique. Issues in  Accounting Education, 3(2), 248–254.
11. Freeman, S., Haak, D., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2011). Increased course structure improves performance in introductory biology. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 10(2), 175–186.
12. Gay, L. R. (1987). Selection of measurement instruments. In L. R. Gay (Ed.), Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application. New York, NY: Macmillan.
13. Geiger, M. A., & Ogilby, S. M. (2000). The first course in accounting: students’ perceptions and their effect on the decision to major in accounting. Journal of Accounting Education, 18(2), 63–78.
14. Keller Jr, C. E., Marcis, J. G., & Deck, A. B. (2006). Institutional factors and student preferences on the syllabus in the principles of accounting course. Journal of Business and Behavioral Sciences, 14(2), 108-123.
15. Keller Jr, C. E., Marcis, J. G., & Deck, A. B. (2008). Demographic factors and student preferences on the syllabus in the principles of accounting course. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 12(2), 11.
16. Manganaris, P., & Spathis, C. (2012). Greek students’ perceptions of an introductory accounting course and the accounting profession. In D. Feldmann & T. Rupert (Eds.), Advances in accounting education: Teaching and  curriculum innovations (pp. 59–85). New York, NY: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
17. Meidrina, T., Mawaddah, S. N., Siahaan, F. M. M., & Widyasari, P. (2017). The relationship between teacher efficacy and attitude towards inclusive education in private elementary school: A study based on teaching experiences. Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(3), 124-134. doi:https://doi.org/10.20474/jahss-3.3.1
18. Muda, S., Hussin, A. H., Johari, H., Sapari, J. M., & Jamil, N. (2013). The key contributing factors of non-accounting students’ failure in the introduction to financial accounting course. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90,712–719. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.144
19. Nedal, O. A., & Alcoriza, M. G. O. (2018). Challenges in education: The untold story of students in Lanao Kapanglao, Glan, Sarangani province. Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(3), 118-126.doi:https://doi.org/10.20474/jahss-4.3.1
20. Osogbe, D. (2010). Introduction to financial accounting course for business administration students in Al-Jabal University. Higher Education Research Review, 7(4), 111–123.
21. Reed, S. A., & Holley, J. M. (1989). The effect of final examination scheduling on student performance. Issues in Accounting Education, 4(2), 327–344.
22. Shauki, E. S., & Setyaningrum, D. (2014). The impact of student perceptions and expectations on student’s results: An empirical study in teaching the introductory accounting course in the university of Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 3(2), 143–167.
23. Skoric, J., & Kupresanin, J. (2018). Social work in educational system of the Balkans – is social worker needeed in schools? International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 4(6), 245-252. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.20469/ijhss.4.10003-6
24. Spiceland, C. P., Spiceland, J. D., & Schaeffer III, S. (2015). Using a course redesign to address retention and performance issues in introductory accounting. Journal of Accounting Education, 33(1), 50–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2014.12.001
25. Uyar, A., & Güngörmü ̧s, A. H. (2011). Factors associated with student performance in financial accounting course. European Journal of Economic & Political Studies, 4(2), 139-154.
26. Uyar, A., Gungormus, A. H., & Kuzey, C. (2011). Factors affecting students career choice in accounting: The case of a Turkish University. American Journal of Business Education (AJBE), 4(10), 29–38.

Bakar, M. A. A. B., Ripain, N., Amirul, S. M., Fatah, N. S. A., & Bosi, M. K. (2019). Perception on introductory accounting course of public university in Sabah, Malaysia: An investigation on program structure, asessment and external factor. International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 5(2), 63-71 doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.20469/ijhss.5.10003-2