Global strategic environment dynamics is inevitably correlated to foreign policy addressed by super power states. Based on economic and political view, CHINA-USA dualism sphere of influence in ASEAN has different dimensions. Rebalancing Asia in Obama’s administration and Indo-pacific Quad-lateral strategy of Trump’s administration are strategies of United States for containing Chinas political influence in Indo-pacific. United States foreign policy cannot be separated from Chinas rising political influence through Belt And Road Initiatives Mega Project in ASEAN. ASEAN Centrality weakness is a threat. As a result of different national interests in ASEAN such as defense alliances and development acceleration interests in several ASEAN states, readdressing ASEAN Centrality is imperative that Indonesia asserts ASEAN identity to be apart of external influences (Major Powers). This challenge could be seen from Dynamic Equilibrium view as a doctrine that has geo-strategy character in its implementation. Marty Natalegawa asserts that Dynamic Equilibrium is geo-strategic balancer to Major Power State’s geopolitics influence in ASEAN. Through qualitative approach, this paper aims to describe a new free-active foreign policy model by Marty Natalegawa through Dynamic Equilibrium doctrine. A geostrategy model rendered of Dynamic Equilibrium doctrine for a writer has required a more advance study and development through deep research. Therefore Dynamic Equilibrium can be a unique Indonesian School Of Thought in Indonesia’s Defense Diplomacy Geo strategy. Finally, this paper will be its introduction.

1. Acharya, A. (2014). Constructing a security community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the problem of regional order. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
2. Bodeen, C. (2018). What we know about China’s increased defense spending in 2018. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2FIoCKj
   
3. Breuning, M. (2007). Foreign policy analysis: A comparative introduction. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   
4. Buzan, B., & Hansen, L. (2009). The evolution of international security studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Cabayan, B., H. Sotirin. (2010). Perspectives on political and social regional stability impacted by global crises –A social science context. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2REUV44
   
6. Cipto, B. (2007). International relations in Southeast Asia. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Pustaka Pelajar.
   
7. Fisher, M. (2016). The South China Sea: Explaining the dispute. Retrieved from https://nyti.ms/2IipDaO
   
8. FPCI. (2018). FPCI public discussion on Indo-Pacific as a concept for regional architecture. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2Ry3Sfk
9. Goldstein, A. (2005). Rising to the challenge: China’s grand strategy and international security. Stanford, UK: Stanford University Press.
   
10. Haggard, S., & Simmons, B. A. (1987). Theories of international regimes. International organization, 41(3), 491–517. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300027569
11. Indonesia Defense Ministry. (2015). National defense strategy. Jakarta, Indonesia: Indonesia Defense Ministry.
12. Khan, K., & Amin, F. (2014). Rebalancing Asia–Pacific: An analysis. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2CqsDQa
    
13. Kumtong, R., Saosaovaphak, A., & Chaiboonsri, C. (2017). Measuring the total factor productivity for international seaport in South East Asia (ASEAN). Journal of Advanced Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(4), 154-167. doi:https://doi.org/10.26500/jarssh-02-2017-0301
14. Lulian, C. (2018). Societal security: An agenda for the Eastern Europe. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2RPGoSg
    
15. Mahbubani, K., & Nair, A. V. (2017). ASEAN and geopolitical rivalries. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2Cpfc2M
    
16. Meriam Webster Dictionary. (2018). Geostrategy. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2HgtCIp
    
17. Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Indonesia. (2007). National defense doctrine. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kemenhan.
    
18. Moodie, M. (2000). Cooperative security: Implications for national security and international relations. Cooperative Monitoring Center, Sandia National Laboratories.
19. Nickols, F. (2016). Strategy: Definition and meaning. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2CvY3ot
    
20. Panda, A. (2017). US, Japan, India, and Australia hold working-level quadrilateral meeting on regional cooperation. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2AFixZn
    
21. Pedrason, R. (2017). ASEANs defence diplomacy: The road to Southeast Asian defence community? (Tech. Rep.). Heidelberg, Germany: Universitat Heidelberg.
    
22. Phyoe, E. E. (2015). The relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth of selected ASEAN countries. International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, 1(4), 132-146. doi:https://doi.org/10.20469/ijbas.10002-4
23. Poling, G. B. (2013). Dynamic equilibrium: Indonesias blueprint for a 21st century Asia Pacific. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2TZMhth
    
24. Rizki, R. M. D. A. . (2016). Conception of dynamic equilibrium as Anti-Indonesian foreign policy anticulation in the Asia Pacific. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2AQuON5
    
25. Severino, R., & Thuzar, M. (2012). ASEAN regionalism and the future of ASEAN-Russia relations. In V. Sumsky, M. Hong, & A. Lugg (Eds.), Asean-russia: Foundations and future prospects. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
26. Smith, N. (2017). Who has the No. 1 economy? Not the US. Retrieved from https://bloom.bg/2QYCLVt
    
27. Statista. (2018). ASEAN countries: Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita in current prices from 2008 to 2018 (in U.S. dollars). Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2DkS9bn
    
28. Sulisworo Dwi, D. B. A., Tri Wahyuningsih. (2012). Indonesia geostrategy. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2MgWPSh
    
29. Suryadinata, L. (1996). Indonesia’s foreign policy under Suharto: Aspiring to international leadership. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish International.
30. Syawfi, I. (2009). Indonesian Defense Diplomacy activities in fulfilling Indonesian Defense objectives (2003-2008). Jakarta, Indonesia: Universitas Indonesia.
    
31. UNESCAP. (2017). A study of ICT connectivity for the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI): Enhancing the collaboration in China-Central Asia corridor (Working paper). Bangkok, Thailand: United Nations.
    
32. Winger, G. (2014). The velvet gauntlet: A theory of defense diplomacy. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2i7ySwP
33. Worldbank. (2018). GDP, PPP (current international $). Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2Kl6Wo1
    
34. Zhihai, X. (2011). The rise of China and its growing role in international organizations. Journal of Modern Chinese Studies, 4(1), 85–96.
    
35. Zoellick, R. B. (2013). US, China and Thucydides. The National Interest(126), 22–30.

Sutiono. (2018). Dynamic equilibrium as Indonesia’s defense diplomacy geo-strategy to address China-US sphere of influence dualism in ASEAN. International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 4(4), 186-193. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.20469/ijhss.4.10004-4